Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel hydrogen peroxide-based regimen versus a benzoyl peroxide-based regimen in mildto- moderate acne. Methods: In this eight-week multicenter study, patients were randomized to either a hydrogen peroxidebased or a benzoyl peroxide-based regimen. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was assessed using the Global acne Grading System (GaGS) at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. at Week 8, a patient self-satisfaction questionnaire was administered. Investigators were also queried at that time regarding assessment of tolerability and cosmetic acceptability. Tolerability was also measured at each visit. Results: Both treatment regimens were associated with improvement of GaGS score at Week 8 compared to baseline (p<0.0001). GaGS score did not diBer significantly between the two regimens over the same period (p=0.7765). No significant adverse events were reported or observed in either treatment arm. Both patients and investigators found both regimens to be similarly eBective and cosmetically acceptable. Conclusion: a novel hydrogen peroxide-based regimen was shown to be comparable in efficacy, safety, and cosmetic acceptability to a benzoyl peroxide-based regimen in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne.

Results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of a hydrogen peroxide-based kit versus a benzoyl peroxide-based kit in mild-to-moderate acne

MICALI, Giuseppe;DALL'OGLIO, Federica Aurelia;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel hydrogen peroxide-based regimen versus a benzoyl peroxide-based regimen in mildto- moderate acne. Methods: In this eight-week multicenter study, patients were randomized to either a hydrogen peroxidebased or a benzoyl peroxide-based regimen. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was assessed using the Global acne Grading System (GaGS) at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. at Week 8, a patient self-satisfaction questionnaire was administered. Investigators were also queried at that time regarding assessment of tolerability and cosmetic acceptability. Tolerability was also measured at each visit. Results: Both treatment regimens were associated with improvement of GaGS score at Week 8 compared to baseline (p<0.0001). GaGS score did not diBer significantly between the two regimens over the same period (p=0.7765). No significant adverse events were reported or observed in either treatment arm. Both patients and investigators found both regimens to be similarly eBective and cosmetically acceptable. Conclusion: a novel hydrogen peroxide-based regimen was shown to be comparable in efficacy, safety, and cosmetic acceptability to a benzoyl peroxide-based regimen in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne.
2016
2708
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Micali Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, ....pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 124.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
124.35 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/308725
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact