BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients undergoing ICSI have been shown to have an increased sperm aneuploidy rate. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of sperm aneuploidy on ICSI outcome.METHODS: To accomplish this, 48 consecutive unselected male patients (median age 34 years) had their sperm aneuploidy rate evaluated in the same swim-up preparation used for ICSI. Chromosomes 8, 12, 18, X and Y were evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Patients were divided into two groups (A and B) based on the sperm aneuploidy frequency in their sperm. Group A had values below and group B above the upper limit of normal [1.55%, determined in 14 healthy men (median age 25 years) with normal semen parameters by WHO 1999 criteria (control group)].RESULTS: Group A consisted of 12 patients (25%) whose sperm aneuploidy rates fell below the cut-off value of the control group (median 1.25%; range 0.85-1.52). Group B consisted of the remaining 36 patients (75%), who had an elevated sperm aneuploidy rate (median 3.25%; range 1.64-23.60). Fertilization (93 versus 85%) and cleavage (100 versus 98%) rates were similar for both groups. Group A had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (75 versus 34%; P < 0.001) and implantation (34 versus 13%; P < 0.001) rates compared with group B. In addition, group A had a lower overall miscarriage rate (11.1 versus 38.9%). Other factors that affect pregnancy and implantation, such as patient age and conventional semen parameters, were similar for both groups.CONCLUSION: This study showed that chromosomally abnormal sperm have a negative impact on ICSI outcome.

Lower sperm aneuploidy frequency is associated with high pregnancy rate in ICSI programmes

VICARI, Enzo Saretto;CALOGERO, Aldo Eugenio
2003-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients undergoing ICSI have been shown to have an increased sperm aneuploidy rate. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of sperm aneuploidy on ICSI outcome.METHODS: To accomplish this, 48 consecutive unselected male patients (median age 34 years) had their sperm aneuploidy rate evaluated in the same swim-up preparation used for ICSI. Chromosomes 8, 12, 18, X and Y were evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Patients were divided into two groups (A and B) based on the sperm aneuploidy frequency in their sperm. Group A had values below and group B above the upper limit of normal [1.55%, determined in 14 healthy men (median age 25 years) with normal semen parameters by WHO 1999 criteria (control group)].RESULTS: Group A consisted of 12 patients (25%) whose sperm aneuploidy rates fell below the cut-off value of the control group (median 1.25%; range 0.85-1.52). Group B consisted of the remaining 36 patients (75%), who had an elevated sperm aneuploidy rate (median 3.25%; range 1.64-23.60). Fertilization (93 versus 85%) and cleavage (100 versus 98%) rates were similar for both groups. Group A had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (75 versus 34%; P < 0.001) and implantation (34 versus 13%; P < 0.001) rates compared with group B. In addition, group A had a lower overall miscarriage rate (11.1 versus 38.9%). Other factors that affect pregnancy and implantation, such as patient age and conventional semen parameters, were similar for both groups.CONCLUSION: This study showed that chromosomally abnormal sperm have a negative impact on ICSI outcome.
2003
Chromosome Aberrations; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods; Infertility, Male/genetics
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
148_Burrello_HumReprod_2003.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 57.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
57.74 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/45603
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 66
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact