The experience of third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib treatment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph’+ ALL) patients post-allogeneic transplantation is limited. We retrospectively collected data on 25 Ph’+ ALL patients who were started on ponatinib after allogeneic transplantation between July 2015 and July 2019 from nine transplantation centers in Italy. Ponatinib was given in prophylaxis in five (20%), as pre-emptive treatment in seven (28%), and as salvage therapy in thirteen (52%) patients. It was combined with donor leukocyte infusions in ten patients. Half of the patients (12/25) harbored T315I mutation of BCR/ABL1, while in the remaining mutational analysis was negative or not performed. Among the 20 patients who received ponatinib as pre-emptive/salvage treatment, complete molecular response was achieved in 15 (75%) patients. Estimated overall survival at 2-year post-initiation of treatment in the whole cohort was 65% (respectively 60%, 60%, and 78% for the prophylaxis, pre-emptive, and salvage therapy groups). In patients with T315I-positive mutational status, the estimated 2-year survival was 40%. Fourteen patients (56%) experienced toxicity, requiring temporary or definitive suspension of treatment. In conclusion, treatment of Ph’+ ALL patients with ponatinib after transplantation is effective, although the question of adequate drug dose and treatment duration remains unanswered.

The role of ponatinib in adult BCR-ABL1 positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic transplantation: a real-life retrospective multicenter study

Markovic U.;Stella S.;Martino M.;Grimaldi F.;Palmieri F.;Milone G. A.;Scalise L.;Di Giorgio M. A.;Di Raimondo F.;Milone G.
2021-01-01

Abstract

The experience of third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib treatment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph’+ ALL) patients post-allogeneic transplantation is limited. We retrospectively collected data on 25 Ph’+ ALL patients who were started on ponatinib after allogeneic transplantation between July 2015 and July 2019 from nine transplantation centers in Italy. Ponatinib was given in prophylaxis in five (20%), as pre-emptive treatment in seven (28%), and as salvage therapy in thirteen (52%) patients. It was combined with donor leukocyte infusions in ten patients. Half of the patients (12/25) harbored T315I mutation of BCR/ABL1, while in the remaining mutational analysis was negative or not performed. Among the 20 patients who received ponatinib as pre-emptive/salvage treatment, complete molecular response was achieved in 15 (75%) patients. Estimated overall survival at 2-year post-initiation of treatment in the whole cohort was 65% (respectively 60%, 60%, and 78% for the prophylaxis, pre-emptive, and salvage therapy groups). In patients with T315I-positive mutational status, the estimated 2-year survival was 40%. Fourteen patients (56%) experienced toxicity, requiring temporary or definitive suspension of treatment. In conclusion, treatment of Ph’+ ALL patients with ponatinib after transplantation is effective, although the question of adequate drug dose and treatment duration remains unanswered.
2021
Allogeneic transplantation
Ph’+acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Ponatinib
Acute Disease
Adult
Chemoprevention
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Imidazoles
Italy
Male
Middle Aged
Philadelphia Chromosome
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
Pyridazines
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
Secondary Prevention
Survival Analysis
Transplantation, Homologous
Young Adult
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Leotta S Ann Haemtol_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 712.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
712.85 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/511257
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact