<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/CINECAstyle.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-22T00:32:34Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.iris.unict.it:20.500.11769/585426" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://www.iris.unict.it/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.iris.unict.it:20.500.11769/585426</identifier><datestamp>2024-01-06T00:07:04Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.11769_434851</setSpec><setSpec>com_123456789_40</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.11769_434852</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>A European survey of Non- Invasive Ventilation (NIV)</dc:title>
<dc:creator>CRIMI, CLAUDIA</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Crimi, Claudia</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>VANCHERI, CARLO</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>VANCHERI, CARLO</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>Europe, noninvasive ventilation, respiratory failure, survey</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Although non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is becoming very popular, little is&#xd;
known about its pattern of clinical and technical utilization in the different environments.&#xd;
We conducted a web-based survey in Europe to identify the perceived pattern of NIV utilization and the reason for choosing a specific ventilator and interface type in 4 common clinical scenarios: Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure (AHRF), Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (CPE), de novo hypoxic respiratory failure, Weaning/Post-extubation failure (W/PE).&#xd;
A response was obtained from 272/530 (51.3%) selected European physicians involved in NIV practice. NIV utilization rate was higher for Pulmonologists than Intensivists/Anesthesiologists (p&amp;lt;0.05). The most common indication was AHRF (48%) for all the physicians. Physicians were more likely to use NIV dedicated ventilator in AHRF and CPE and ICU ventilator with NIV module in de novo hypoxic respiratory failure and W/PE, mainly because of the possibility of using the double circuit and FiO2 control. Oro-nasal mask was overall the most frequently used interface, irrespecteve of clinical scenarios.&#xd;
The use of NIV in Europe is generally relatively high, especially among&#xd;
Pulmonologists, and in AHRF. Dedicated NIV ventilators and ICU ventilators with NIV modules are preferably used in AHRF and in de-novo hypoxic respiratory failure, respectively, together with oro-nasal masks.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2011-12-10</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/585426</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Università degli studi di Catania</dc:publisher>
<dc:publisher>place:Catania</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights>license:PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>license uri:iris.PUB02</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>