Although many regions of the world are recognized as earthquake prone areas, a large part of the buildings spread on those territories suffer from structural deficiencies and are not able to sustain horizontal forces. For instance, many structures, which are in use today in Italy, are not adequate to face strong ground motions due to different reasons. A large part of the buildings was designed before seismic provisions became mandatory, taking into account the only effect of gravity loads. Many other structures were designed for seismic levels that today are not sufficient, because of the update of the national seismic hazard map. Furthermore, the use of material with lower characteristics than those assumed in the design and their degradation during time yield to even worse seismic performance. The insertion of BRBs in the RC structure is considered a promising solution for the seismic upgrading of RC buildings, and to this end a design method has been presented in a companion paper. This paper aims at testing the developed design procedure on three case study frames, affected by the most common structural deficiencies of Italian buildings. The design method is applied considering different values of the design parameters, to investigate their influence on the response of each upgraded frame. The seismic performance of the rehabilitated frames is assessed by nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results show the effectiveness of the design method, which successfully designs the BRBs for every frame considered, regardless of the specific structural issues. Moreover, information about the most proper values to assign to the ruling parameters is provided.

Seismic upgrading of typical Italian existing RC frames by BRBs

BARBAGALLO, FRANCESCA;BOSCO, MELINA;MARINO, EDOARDO MICHELE;ROSSI, PIER PAOLO;STRAMONDO, PAOLA ROBERTA
2017-01-01

Abstract

Although many regions of the world are recognized as earthquake prone areas, a large part of the buildings spread on those territories suffer from structural deficiencies and are not able to sustain horizontal forces. For instance, many structures, which are in use today in Italy, are not adequate to face strong ground motions due to different reasons. A large part of the buildings was designed before seismic provisions became mandatory, taking into account the only effect of gravity loads. Many other structures were designed for seismic levels that today are not sufficient, because of the update of the national seismic hazard map. Furthermore, the use of material with lower characteristics than those assumed in the design and their degradation during time yield to even worse seismic performance. The insertion of BRBs in the RC structure is considered a promising solution for the seismic upgrading of RC buildings, and to this end a design method has been presented in a companion paper. This paper aims at testing the developed design procedure on three case study frames, affected by the most common structural deficiencies of Italian buildings. The design method is applied considering different values of the design parameters, to investigate their influence on the response of each upgraded frame. The seismic performance of the rehabilitated frames is assessed by nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results show the effectiveness of the design method, which successfully designs the BRBs for every frame considered, regardless of the specific structural issues. Moreover, information about the most proper values to assign to the ruling parameters is provided.
2017
Retrofitting
Existing structure
Buckling Restrained Brace
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Marino Seismic upgrading.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 323.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
323.43 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/303048
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact