The origins of the rebus, the game made famous in modern times by puzzle magazines, are intertwined with the very origins of language. Its complexity –a mixture of graphic signs and alphabetical characters– elevates it from a simple divertissement amusement to a veritable heuristic device capable of synthesising fragments of text and images into a representation dense with cultural and semiotic meanings. This brief note, an in-complete outline of a broader study on the interconnections between drawing and ethnography, aims to highlight the nature of the rebus as an interpretative device. A ‘place’ of convergence between systems of signs, heterogeneous modes of thought and hermeneutic practices, where unexpected dynamics between visual representation and writing are concentrated, and where –similar to the mechanisms of architectural drawing– a delicate balance between mimetic and poietic aspects is at work.Among these practices, ethnographic participant observation –introduced by Bronislaw Kasper Malinowski– emphasises the active role of the observer in reading things. Like the anthropologist in the field, the rebus solver is called upon to participate in the represented context, deciphering symbolic and narrative relation-ships between subjects, objects and environments. This approach is also reflected in the graphic represen-tation, where drawing becomes a form of interpretation and cultural mediation, capable of translating visual experience into a graphic-semiotic synthesis. Its ability to combine images and words in an interactive system makes the rebus a powerful reference for understanding and representing the complexity of reality. It can be inferred that rebuses and disciplines related to the reading of reality –such as drawing, ethnography and visual culture– share a common cognitive function, rooted in the interaction between visual and narrative elements, between sign and meaning, thus opening up new spaces of reflection for representation in the field of architecture and the social sciences.
Le origini del rebus, il gioco reso celebre in tempi moderni dalle riviste d’enigmistica, si intrecciano con le origini stesse del linguaggio. La sua complessità – ottenuta dalla miscela di segni grafici e ca-ratteri alfabetici – lo eleva da mero divertissement, utile a riempire il tempo libero, a vero e proprio dispositivo euristico capace di sintetizzare frammenti di testo e immagini in una rappresentazione densa di significati culturali e semiotici. Questa breve nota, abbozzo incompleto di uno studio più ampio sulle interconnessioni tra disegno ed etnografia, si prefigura di mettere in risalto la natura del rebus come congegno interpretativo. Un ‘luogo’ – solo in apparenza limitato ai margini della vignetta – di convergenza tra sistemi di segni, modalità di pensiero eterogenee e pratiche ermeneutiche, dove si concentrano inaspettate dinamiche tra rappresentazione visiva e scrittura, e all’interno del quale – similmente ai meccanismi del disegno d’architettura – si opera attraverso un delicato equilibrio tra aspetti mimetici e poietici.Tra queste pratiche, l’osservazione partecipante di matrice etnografica – introdotta da Bronislaw Ka-sper Malinowski – sottolinea il ruolo attivo dell’osservatore nella lettura delle cose. Come l’antropo-logo sul campo, il risolutore del rebus è chiamato a partecipare al contesto rappresentato, decifrando relazioni simboliche e narrative tra soggetti, oggetti e ambienti. Questo approccio si riflette anche nella rappresentazione grafica, dove il disegno diventa una forma di interpretazione e mediazione culturale, capace di tradurre l’esperienza visiva in una sintesi grafico-semiotica.Si evince che, rebus e discipline legate alla lettura del reale – come disegno, etnografia e cultura visuale – condividono una funzione conoscitiva comune, radicata nell’interazione tra elementi visivi e narrativi, tra segno e significato, nella speranza, così, di aprire nuovi spazi di riflessione per la rappre-sentazione nell’ambito dell’architettura e delle scienze sociali.
Il potere euristico del rebus. Il disegno come lente antropologica
Felice RomanoPrimo
2025-01-01
Abstract
The origins of the rebus, the game made famous in modern times by puzzle magazines, are intertwined with the very origins of language. Its complexity –a mixture of graphic signs and alphabetical characters– elevates it from a simple divertissement amusement to a veritable heuristic device capable of synthesising fragments of text and images into a representation dense with cultural and semiotic meanings. This brief note, an in-complete outline of a broader study on the interconnections between drawing and ethnography, aims to highlight the nature of the rebus as an interpretative device. A ‘place’ of convergence between systems of signs, heterogeneous modes of thought and hermeneutic practices, where unexpected dynamics between visual representation and writing are concentrated, and where –similar to the mechanisms of architectural drawing– a delicate balance between mimetic and poietic aspects is at work.Among these practices, ethnographic participant observation –introduced by Bronislaw Kasper Malinowski– emphasises the active role of the observer in reading things. Like the anthropologist in the field, the rebus solver is called upon to participate in the represented context, deciphering symbolic and narrative relation-ships between subjects, objects and environments. This approach is also reflected in the graphic represen-tation, where drawing becomes a form of interpretation and cultural mediation, capable of translating visual experience into a graphic-semiotic synthesis. Its ability to combine images and words in an interactive system makes the rebus a powerful reference for understanding and representing the complexity of reality. It can be inferred that rebuses and disciplines related to the reading of reality –such as drawing, ethnography and visual culture– share a common cognitive function, rooted in the interaction between visual and narrative elements, between sign and meaning, thus opening up new spaces of reflection for representation in the field of architecture and the social sciences.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.