Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
The sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays are still unknown, but assuming standard physics, they are expected to lie within a few hundred megaparsecs from us. Indeed, over cosmological distances cosmic rays lose energy to interactions with background photons, at a rate depending on their massnumberandenergyandpropertiesofphotonuclearinteractionsandphotonbackgrounds. The universe is not homogeneous at such scales, hence the distribution of the arrival directions of cosmic rays is expected to reflect the inhomogeneities in the distribution of galaxies; the shorter the energy loss lengths, the stronger the expected anisotropies. Galactic and intergalactic magnetic f ields can blur and distort the picture, but the magnitudes of the largest-scale anisotropies, namely the dipole and quadrupole moments, are the most robust to their effects. Measuring them with no bias regardless of any higher-order multipoles is not possible except with full-sky coverage. In this work, we achieve this in three energy ranges (approximately 8–16 EeV, 16–32 EeV, and 32–∞ EeV) by combining surface-detector data collected at the Pierre Auger Observatory until 2020 and at the Telescope Array (TA) until 2019, before the completion of the upgrades of the arrays with new scintillator detectors. We find that the full-sky coverage achieved by combining Auger and TA data reduces the uncertainties on the north-south components of the dipole and quadrupole in half compared to Auger-only results.
The UHECR dipole and quadrupole in the latest data from the original Auger and TA surface detectors
Tinyakov, P.;Anchordoqui, L.;Bister, T.;Biteau, J.;Caccianiga, L.;de Almeida, R.;Deligny, O.;di Matteo, A.;Giaccari, U.;Harari, D.;Kim, J.;Kuznetsov, M.;Maris, I.;Rubtsov, G.;Troitsky, S.;Urban, F.;Abreu, P.;Aglietta, M.;Albury, J. M.;Allekotte, I.;Almela, A.;Alvarez-Mu(\~n)iz, J.;Alves Batista, R.;Anastasi, G. A.;Anchordoqui, L.;Andrada, B.;Andringa, S.;Aramo, C.;Ara('u)jo Ferreira, P. R.;Arteaga Vel('a)zquez, J. C.;Asorey, H.;Assis, P.;Avila, G.;Badescu, A. M.;Bakalova, A.;Balaceanu, A.;Barbato, F.;Barreira Luz, R. J.;Becker, K. H.;Bellido, J. A.;Berat, C.;Bertaina, M. E.;Bertou, X.;Biermann, P. L.;Binet, V.;Bismark, K.;Bister, T.;Biteau, J.;Blazek, J.;Bleve, C.;Boh('a)?ov('a), M.;Boncioli, D.;Bonifazi, C.;Bonneau Arbeletche, L.;Borodai, N.;Botti, A. M.;Brack, J.;Bretz, T.;Brichetto Orchera, P. G.;Briechle, F. L.;Buchholz, P.;Bueno, A.;Buitink, S.;Buscemi, M.;M. Büsken39;8;K. S. Caballero-Mora66;L. Caccianiga59;49;F. Canfora80;81;I. Caracas38;J. M. Carceller78;R. Caruso;47;A. Castellina54;52;F. Catalani19;G. Cataldi48;L. Cazon72;M. Cerda10;J. A. Chinellato22;J. Chudoba32;L. Chytka33;R. W. Clay13;A. C. Cobos Cerutti7;R. Colalillo60;50;A. Coleman93;M. R. Coluccia48;R. Conceição72;A. Condorelli45;46;G. Consolati49;55;F. Contreras11;F. Convenga56;48;D. Correia dos Santos28;C. E. Covault85;S. Dasso5;3;K. Daumiller41;B. R. Dawson13;J. A. Day13;R. M. de Almeida28;J. de Jesús8;41;S. J. de Jong80;81;G. De Mauro80;81;J. R. T. de Mello Neto26;27;I. De Mitri45;46;J. de Oliveira18;D. de Oliveira Franco22;F. de Palma56;48;V. de Souza20;E. De Vito56;48;M. del Río11;O. Deligny34;L. Deval41;8;A. di Matteo52;C. Dobrigkeit22;J. C. D’Olivo68;L. M. Domingues Mendes72;R. C. dos Anjos25;D. dos Santos28;M. T. Dova4;J. Ebr32;R. Engel39;41;I. Epicoco56;48;M. Erdmann42;C. O. Escobar푎;A. Etchegoyen8;12;H. Falcke80;82 81;J. Farmer92;G. Farrar90;A. C. Fauth22;N. Fazzini푎;F. Feldbusch40;F. Fenu54;52;B. Fick89;J. M. Figueira8;A. Filipčič77;76;T. Fitoussi41;T. Fodran80;M. M. Freire6;T. Fujii92;푒;A. Fuster8;12;C. Galea80;C. Galelli59;49;B. García7;A. L. Garcia Vegas42;H. Gemmeke40;F. Gesualdi8;41;A. Gherghel-Lascu73;P. L. Ghia34;U. Giaccari80;M. Giammarchi49;J. Glombitza42;F. Gobbi10;F. Gollan8;G. Golup1;M. Gómez Berisso1;P. F. Gómez Vitale11;J. P. Gongora11;J. M. González1;N. González14;I. Goos1;41;D. Góra70;A. Gorgi54;52;M. Gottowik38;T. D. Grubb13;F. Guarino60;50;G. P. Guedes23;E. Guido52;63;S. Hahn41;8;P. Hamal32;M. R. Hampel8;P. Hansen4;D. Harari1;V. M. Harvey13;A. Haungs41;T. Hebbeker42;D. Heck41;G. C. Hill13;C. Hojvat푎;J. R. Hörandel80;81;P. Horvath33;M. Hrabovský33;T. Huege41;15;A. Insolia58;47;P. G. Isar74;P. Janecek32;J. A. Johnsen86;J. Jurysek32;A. Kääpä38;K. H. Kampert38;N. Karastathis41;B. Keilhauer41;J. Kemp42;A. Khakurdikar80;V. V. Kizakke Covilakam8;41;H. O. Klages41;M. Kleifges40;J. Kleinfeller10;M. Köpke39;N. Kunka40;B. L. Lago17;R. G. Lang20;N. Langner42;M. A. Leigui de Oliveira24;V. Lenok41;A. Letessier-Selvon35;I. LhenryYvon34;D. Lo Presti58;47;L. Lopes72;R. López64;L. Lu94;Q. Luce39;J. P. Lundquist76;A. Machado Payeras22;G. Mancarella56;48;D. Mandat32;B. C. Manning13;J. Manshanden43;P. Mantsch푎;S. Marafico34;A. G. Mariazzi4;I. C. Mariş14;G. Marsella61;47;D. Martello56;48;S. Martinelli41;8;O. Martínez Bravo64;M. Mastrodicasa57;46;H. J. Mathes41;J. Matthews88;G. Matthiae62;51;E. Mayotte38;P. O. Mazur푎;G. MedinaTanco68;D. Melo8;A. Menshikov40;K. -D. Merenda86;S. Michal33;M. I. Micheletti6;L. Miramonti59;49;S. Mollerach1;F. Montanet36;C. Morello54;52;M. Mostafá91;A. L. Müller8;M. A. Muller22;K. Mulrey15;R. Mussa52;M. Muzio90;W. M. Namasaka38;A. Nasr-Esfahani38;L. Nellen68;M. Niculescu-Oglinzanu73;M. Niechciol44;D. Nitz89;D. Nosek31;V. Novotny31;L. Nožka33;A Nucita56;48;L. A. Núñez30;M. Palatka32;J. Pallotta2;P. Papenbreer38;G. Parente79;A. Parra64;J. Pawlowsky38;M. Pech32;F. Pedreira79;J. Pe¸kala70;R. Pelayo65;J. Peña-Rodriguez30;E. E. Pereira Martins39;8;J. Perez Armand21;C. Pérez Bertolli8;41;M. Perlin8;41;L. Perrone56;48;S. Petrera45;46;T. Pierog41;M. Pimenta72;V. Pirronello58;47;M. Platino8;B. Pont80;M. Pothast81;80;P. Privitera92;M. Prouza32;A. Puyleart89;S. Querchfeld38;J. Rautenberg38;D. Ravignani8;M. Reininghaus41;8;J. Ridky32;F. Riehn72;M. Risse44;V. Rizi57;46;W. Rodrigues de Carvalho21;J. Rodriguez Rojo11;M. J. Roncoroni8;S. Rossoni43;M. Roth41;E. Roulet1;A. C. Rovero5;P. Ruehl44;A. Saftoiu73;F. Salamida57;46;H. Salazar64;G. Salina51;J. D. Sanabria Gomez30;F. Sánchez8;E. M. Santos21;E. Santos32;F. Sarazin86;R. Sarmento72;C. Sarmiento-Cano8;R. Sato11 P. Savina56;48 34;94;C. M. Schäfer41;V. Scherini56;48;H. Schieler41;M. Schimassek39;8;M. Schimp38;F. Schlüter41;8;D. Schmidt39;O. Scholten84;15;P. Schovánek32;F. G. Schröder93;41;S. Schröder38;J. Schulte42;S. J. Sciutto4;M. Scornavacche8;41;A. Segreto53;47;S. Sehgal38;R. C. Shellard16;G. Sigl43;G. Silli8;41;O. Sima73;푓;R. Šmída92;P. Sommers91;J. F. Soriano87;J. Souchard36;R. Squartini10;M. Stadelmaier41;8;D. Stanca73;S. Stanič76;J. Stasielak70;P. Stassi36;A. Streich39;8;M. Suárez-Durán14;T. Sudholz13;T. Suomijärvi37;A. D. Supanitsky8;Z. Szadkowski71;A. Tapia29;C. Taricco63;52;C. Timmermans81;80;O. Tkachenko41;P. Tobiska32;C. J. Todero Peixoto19;B. Tomé72;Z. Torrès36;A. Travaini10;P. Travnicek32;C. Trimarelli57;46;M. Tueros4;R. Ulrich41;M. Unger41;L. Vaclavek33;M. Vacula33;J. F. Valdés Galicia68;L. Valore60;50;E. Varela64;A. Vásquez-Ramírez30;D. Veberič41;C. Ventura27;I. D. Vergara Quispe4;V. Verzi51;J. Vicha32;J. Vink83;S. Vorobiov76;H. Wahlberg4;C. Watanabe26;A. A. Watson푐;M. Weber40;A. Weindl41;L. Wiencke86;H. Wilczyński70;M. Wirtz42;D. Wittkowski38;B. Wundheiler8;A. Yushkov32;O. Zapparrata14;E. Zas79;D. Zavrtanik76;77;M. Zavrtanik77;76;L. Zehrer76
2021-01-01
Abstract
The sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays are still unknown, but assuming standard physics, they are expected to lie within a few hundred megaparsecs from us. Indeed, over cosmological distances cosmic rays lose energy to interactions with background photons, at a rate depending on their massnumberandenergyandpropertiesofphotonuclearinteractionsandphotonbackgrounds. The universe is not homogeneous at such scales, hence the distribution of the arrival directions of cosmic rays is expected to reflect the inhomogeneities in the distribution of galaxies; the shorter the energy loss lengths, the stronger the expected anisotropies. Galactic and intergalactic magnetic f ields can blur and distort the picture, but the magnitudes of the largest-scale anisotropies, namely the dipole and quadrupole moments, are the most robust to their effects. Measuring them with no bias regardless of any higher-order multipoles is not possible except with full-sky coverage. In this work, we achieve this in three energy ranges (approximately 8–16 EeV, 16–32 EeV, and 32–∞ EeV) by combining surface-detector data collected at the Pierre Auger Observatory until 2020 and at the Telescope Array (TA) until 2019, before the completion of the upgrades of the arrays with new scintillator detectors. We find that the full-sky coverage achieved by combining Auger and TA data reduces the uncertainties on the north-south components of the dipole and quadrupole in half compared to Auger-only results.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/691560
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.