The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector is a major contributor to global energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable practices. This research investigates the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) with sustainability assessment frameworks, specifically focusing on the “Materials” category in green building certification systems such as LEED and BREEAM. By conducting a systematic literature review using the PRISMA methodology, this study identifies 11 key articles addressing frameworks, tools, and methodologies for automating the verification of material-related credits. The analysis categorizes these frameworks into three sustainability categories: Lower Environmental Impact Materials (Sc1), Responsible Sourcing and Renewable Materials (Sc2), and Sustainable Waste Management (Sc3). Findings reveal that while BIM enhances sustainability assessments through improved data management and automation, challenges such as interoperability issues, limited material databases, and reliance on specific software persist. This study underscores the critical role of automation and digital tools, including visual programming languages and APIs, in streamlining credit verification processes and promoting sustainability objectives. Future research should focus on expanding material databases, addressing interoperability barriers, and leveraging emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins to foster a more sustainable and technologically advanced construction industry. These advancements align with the global goals of digital and green transitions, contributing to a more sustainable built environment.

Digital Integration for Sustainable Construction: Automating Material Credit Verification in Green Certification Systems

Parisi G.;Caponetto R.
2025-01-01

Abstract

The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector is a major contributor to global energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable practices. This research investigates the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) with sustainability assessment frameworks, specifically focusing on the “Materials” category in green building certification systems such as LEED and BREEAM. By conducting a systematic literature review using the PRISMA methodology, this study identifies 11 key articles addressing frameworks, tools, and methodologies for automating the verification of material-related credits. The analysis categorizes these frameworks into three sustainability categories: Lower Environmental Impact Materials (Sc1), Responsible Sourcing and Renewable Materials (Sc2), and Sustainable Waste Management (Sc3). Findings reveal that while BIM enhances sustainability assessments through improved data management and automation, challenges such as interoperability issues, limited material databases, and reliance on specific software persist. This study underscores the critical role of automation and digital tools, including visual programming languages and APIs, in streamlining credit verification processes and promoting sustainability objectives. Future research should focus on expanding material databases, addressing interoperability barriers, and leveraging emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins to foster a more sustainable and technologically advanced construction industry. These advancements align with the global goals of digital and green transitions, contributing to a more sustainable built environment.
2025
9783032069924
9783032069931
Building Information Modeling (BIM)
Digital Workflows for Sustainability
Environmental Performance Assessment
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
Rating Systems
Sustainable Materials Evaluation
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/700893
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact