This study investigates the persuasive and argumentative behaviors of two LLM-based chatbots, ChatGPT and Gemini, within the context of movie recommendation dialogues. Drawing on insights from argumentation-based dialogue and anthropomorphism research, we introduce a fine-grained annotation scheme to analyze chatbot strategies across dialogue phases. Through both linguistic analysis and user evaluation via ResQue and Godspeed questionnaires, we assess the systems’ recommendation quality, perceived human-likeness, and strategic variation. Our findings reveal distinct conversational patterns.
Strategic Conversations: LLMs Argumentation and User Perception in Movie Recommendation Dialogues
Valeria Mauro;
2025-01-01
Abstract
This study investigates the persuasive and argumentative behaviors of two LLM-based chatbots, ChatGPT and Gemini, within the context of movie recommendation dialogues. Drawing on insights from argumentation-based dialogue and anthropomorphism research, we introduce a fine-grained annotation scheme to analyze chatbot strategies across dialogue phases. Through both linguistic analysis and user evaluation via ResQue and Godspeed questionnaires, we assess the systems’ recommendation quality, perceived human-likeness, and strategic variation. Our findings reveal distinct conversational patterns.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


