This study investigates the persuasive and argumentative behaviors of two LLM-based chatbots, ChatGPT and Gemini, within the context of movie recommendation dialogues. Drawing on insights from argumentation-based dialogue and anthropomorphism research, we introduce a fine-grained annotation scheme to analyze chatbot strategies across dialogue phases. Through both linguistic analysis and user evaluation via ResQue and Godspeed questionnaires, we assess the systems’ recommendation quality, perceived human-likeness, and strategic variation. Our findings reveal distinct conversational patterns.

Strategic Conversations: LLMs Argumentation and User Perception in Movie Recommendation Dialogues

Valeria Mauro;
2025-01-01

Abstract

This study investigates the persuasive and argumentative behaviors of two LLM-based chatbots, ChatGPT and Gemini, within the context of movie recommendation dialogues. Drawing on insights from argumentation-based dialogue and anthropomorphism research, we introduce a fine-grained annotation scheme to analyze chatbot strategies across dialogue phases. Through both linguistic analysis and user evaluation via ResQue and Godspeed questionnaires, we assess the systems’ recommendation quality, perceived human-likeness, and strategic variation. Our findings reveal distinct conversational patterns.
2025
Argumentation-based dialogue, Conversational Recommender Systems, Anthropomorphism
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/727490
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact