Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings represent a high percentage of existing buildings in many seismically prone areas around the world. A rigorous simulation of the nonlinear dynamic behaviour of URM buildings requires refined nonlinear finite element numerical models and a consistent computational cost, making these methods unsuitable for practical applications. For this reason, in recent decades, many researchers have proposed simplified alternative methodologies. In this paper two different macro-element simplified models are compared and applied to a benchmark URM prototype structure. The first numerical approach is based on the discretization of the structure into piers and spandrels, which are connected by rigid nodes, hence creating an equivalent frame model. An efficient nonlinear fibresection force-based frame element, which accounts for shear deformation and shear failure, allows a straightforward and accurate simulation of the combined axialflexural behaviour of both piers and spandrels according to uniaxial constitutive laws. The second numerical strategy is based on a plane macro-element whose kinematics, governed by a discrete distribution of nonlinear springs mounted on an articulated quadrilateral, that allows a reasonable and accurate prediction of the inplane behaviour of masonry walls. The paper shows that both approaches can be successfully applied for the seismic assessment of URM buildings. Benefits and drawbacks of both models are highlighted with the aim of providing recommendations for a proper use of these powerful, but not always applicable, computational strategies.

Numerical macro-modeling of unreinforced masonry structures: a critical appraisal

Cannizzaro F.;CADDEMI, Salvatore;CALIO', Ivo Domenico
2015-01-01

Abstract

Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings represent a high percentage of existing buildings in many seismically prone areas around the world. A rigorous simulation of the nonlinear dynamic behaviour of URM buildings requires refined nonlinear finite element numerical models and a consistent computational cost, making these methods unsuitable for practical applications. For this reason, in recent decades, many researchers have proposed simplified alternative methodologies. In this paper two different macro-element simplified models are compared and applied to a benchmark URM prototype structure. The first numerical approach is based on the discretization of the structure into piers and spandrels, which are connected by rigid nodes, hence creating an equivalent frame model. An efficient nonlinear fibresection force-based frame element, which accounts for shear deformation and shear failure, allows a straightforward and accurate simulation of the combined axialflexural behaviour of both piers and spandrels according to uniaxial constitutive laws. The second numerical strategy is based on a plane macro-element whose kinematics, governed by a discrete distribution of nonlinear springs mounted on an articulated quadrilateral, that allows a reasonable and accurate prediction of the inplane behaviour of masonry walls. The paper shows that both approaches can be successfully applied for the seismic assessment of URM buildings. Benefits and drawbacks of both models are highlighted with the aim of providing recommendations for a proper use of these powerful, but not always applicable, computational strategies.
2015
978-1-905088-63-8
Fibre section; Force based element; Macro-element; Nonlinear dynamic analyses; Seismic assessment; Unreinforced masonry
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/95145
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact