In the Western legal tradition, the construction of the concept of self-defense has encountered openings and resistances, deeply linked to the universe of Christian moral and ethics with which the conviction, belonging to Roman law, openly clashes, that the use of violence to defend oneself must be justified themselves or their own things. The principle of vim vi repellere licet is revised by medieval jurists who construct a new and different figure of murder in self-defense.

«Qui occidit se defendendo non dicitur occidere». L’omicidio a difesa della propria persona al banco di prova dei valori cristiani tra responsabilità ex facto e principio di volontarietà. Brevi riflessioni,

R. Sorice
2020-01-01

Abstract

In the Western legal tradition, the construction of the concept of self-defense has encountered openings and resistances, deeply linked to the universe of Christian moral and ethics with which the conviction, belonging to Roman law, openly clashes, that the use of violence to defend oneself must be justified themselves or their own things. The principle of vim vi repellere licet is revised by medieval jurists who construct a new and different figure of murder in self-defense.
2020
978-88-15-28726-7
Self-defense, Murder, History of Law
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020 Sorice Qui occidit defendendo Studi Romano.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 178.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
178.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/499682
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact