Does anyone who, at the time of getting married, suffers from radical doubts and reservations about the possibility of the marriage working have a legally relevant obligation to reveal such doubts to the future spouse? The Court of Cassation addresses this peculiar and original question as if a negative answer should automatically come from the acquired jurisprudential elaborations, but these critical notes highlight how even if the interest in confidentiality is considered to be included in marital freedom, this constitutes a conditional right in the face of the personality rights of the other spouse

Sposarsi per prova è fonte di responsabilità?

mauceri
2025-01-01

Abstract

Does anyone who, at the time of getting married, suffers from radical doubts and reservations about the possibility of the marriage working have a legally relevant obligation to reveal such doubts to the future spouse? The Court of Cassation addresses this peculiar and original question as if a negative answer should automatically come from the acquired jurisprudential elaborations, but these critical notes highlight how even if the interest in confidentiality is considered to be included in marital freedom, this constitutes a conditional right in the face of the personality rights of the other spouse
2025
matrimonio riserva mentale responsabilità danno ingiusto
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/675769
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact