The essay reconstructs the events and management of collective land owner-ship in Sicily, through the cases of Mistretta and Lentini. The analysis of the opinion given in 1907 by Emanuele Carnevale on the former fiefdoms of Mis-tretta clarifies the persistent universal state ownership of the lands redeemed from feudal subjugation and excludes their municipal capitalisation. The ju-rist’s arguments, rooted in medieval legal tradition, qualify civic uses as impre-scriptible rights that are functional to the sustenance of present and future communities. A comparison with the case of Lentini shows the long-term ina-bility of the managing bodies to overcome the patrimonialist view of the man-agement of civic uses and collective domains as instruments of intergenera-tional solidarity and guardians of environmental sustainability
Il saggio ricostruisce le vicende e la gestione degli assetti fondiari collettivi in Sicilia, attraverso i casi di Mistretta e Lentini. L’analisi del parere reso nel 1907 da Emanuele Carnevale sugli ex feudi di Mistretta chiarisce la persistente natura demaniale universale delle terre riscattate dalla soggezione feudale ed esclude la loro patrimonializzazione comunale. Le argomentazioni del giuri-sta, radicate nella tradizione giuridica medievale, qualificano gli usi civici co-me diritti imprescrittibili e funzionali al sostentamento delle comunità pre-senti e future. Il confronto con il caso di Lentini, mostra nel lungo periodo l’incapacità degli enti gestori di superare la visione patrimonialistica della ge-stione degli usi civici e dei domini collettivi quali strumenti di solidarietà in-tergenerazionale e presidi di sostenibilità ambientale.
Sulla natura giuridica degli ex-feudi in Sicilia da Mistretta agli Iblei - On the legal nature of former feudal lands in Sicily, from Mistretta to Iblei
R. Sorice
2026-01-01
Abstract
The essay reconstructs the events and management of collective land owner-ship in Sicily, through the cases of Mistretta and Lentini. The analysis of the opinion given in 1907 by Emanuele Carnevale on the former fiefdoms of Mis-tretta clarifies the persistent universal state ownership of the lands redeemed from feudal subjugation and excludes their municipal capitalisation. The ju-rist’s arguments, rooted in medieval legal tradition, qualify civic uses as impre-scriptible rights that are functional to the sustenance of present and future communities. A comparison with the case of Lentini shows the long-term ina-bility of the managing bodies to overcome the patrimonialist view of the man-agement of civic uses and collective domains as instruments of intergenera-tional solidarity and guardians of environmental sustainabilityI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


