Background/aim: The aim of this study was to compare the role of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the assessment of osteoporosis. Methods: From June 1999 to November 2001, 596 women who have not been diagnosed osteoporosis and without previous history of pathologic fractures were enrolled in this study. They had a mean age of 58.7 +/- 8.5 years, a mean height of 166 +/- 3.5 cm and a mean weight of 66 +/- 4.1 kg. According to the age, women were divided into three groups: group A included women between 45 and 55 years; group B women between 56 and 66 years and group C women between 67 and 77 years. Each patient underwent to both methods to determine the presence of osteoporosis. Results: QUS resulted in a greater number of women of group A at risk of osteoporosis, whereas DEXA indicated that more women of group C were at increased osteoporotic risk. QUS and DEXA gave concordant results only in women of group B. Conclusion: These results suggested that QUS screening for osteoporosis may be more suitable for 'younger' postmenopausal women. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Role of DEXA and ultrasonometry in the evaluation of osteoporotic risk in postmenopausal women

CIOTTA, Lilliana;CIANCI, Antonio
2002-01-01

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to compare the role of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the assessment of osteoporosis. Methods: From June 1999 to November 2001, 596 women who have not been diagnosed osteoporosis and without previous history of pathologic fractures were enrolled in this study. They had a mean age of 58.7 +/- 8.5 years, a mean height of 166 +/- 3.5 cm and a mean weight of 66 +/- 4.1 kg. According to the age, women were divided into three groups: group A included women between 45 and 55 years; group B women between 56 and 66 years and group C women between 67 and 77 years. Each patient underwent to both methods to determine the presence of osteoporosis. Results: QUS resulted in a greater number of women of group A at risk of osteoporosis, whereas DEXA indicated that more women of group C were at increased osteoporotic risk. QUS and DEXA gave concordant results only in women of group B. Conclusion: These results suggested that QUS screening for osteoporosis may be more suitable for 'younger' postmenopausal women. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
role of dexa.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 7.13 kB
Formato Unknown
7.13 kB Unknown   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/21986
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact