Intrahepatic lithiasis (IHL) is a very rare disease in Europe and no gold-standard treatment has yet been codified. The aim of our study is to report our personal experience of IHL detected in 20 patients (6 males [30%] and 14 females [70%]) between January 1982 and December 1991. Eleven (55%) of these cases presented with only IHL, 7 cases (35%) had IHL associated with gallbladder or common bile duct stones, while 2 (10%) were affected by secondary IHL caused by previous biliodigestive anastomosis-induced stricture. The diagnosis was determined by cholangiography in all patients, by ultrasound in 94.7%, and by computed tomography in 70%, The surgical procedures used were as follows: liver resection in 12 patients (60%); various types of biliodigestive anastomosis in 6 cases (30%); choledocholithotomy with a simultaneous removal of stones from the hepatic duct in 2 patients (10%). The intraoperative mortality rate was nil, Complications consisted of 2 subphrenic abscesses, I septicemia, and 1 bowel occlusion, Two patients (10%) dropped out of the follow-up, 2 (10%) died 2 Sears after surgery for reasons not connected with the disease, 1 (5%) died from suppurative cholangitis 6 months after surgery, 2 (10%) had recurrent stones and were treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy and endoscopic stone removal, while the remaining 13 patients (65%) are symptom-free at follow-up which varied between 6 months and 11 years, Liver resection is the treatment of choice when IHL is confined to one lobe of the liver. When IHL affects the entire liver, a resection of the main involved area should be performed whenever possible. Other options include hepatoduodenal anastomosis using the interposed jejunal loop to enable endoscopic or combined treatment of recurrent stones

Intrahepatic lithiasis: a Western experience

DI CARLO, Isidoro;
2000-01-01

Abstract

Intrahepatic lithiasis (IHL) is a very rare disease in Europe and no gold-standard treatment has yet been codified. The aim of our study is to report our personal experience of IHL detected in 20 patients (6 males [30%] and 14 females [70%]) between January 1982 and December 1991. Eleven (55%) of these cases presented with only IHL, 7 cases (35%) had IHL associated with gallbladder or common bile duct stones, while 2 (10%) were affected by secondary IHL caused by previous biliodigestive anastomosis-induced stricture. The diagnosis was determined by cholangiography in all patients, by ultrasound in 94.7%, and by computed tomography in 70%, The surgical procedures used were as follows: liver resection in 12 patients (60%); various types of biliodigestive anastomosis in 6 cases (30%); choledocholithotomy with a simultaneous removal of stones from the hepatic duct in 2 patients (10%). The intraoperative mortality rate was nil, Complications consisted of 2 subphrenic abscesses, I septicemia, and 1 bowel occlusion, Two patients (10%) dropped out of the follow-up, 2 (10%) died 2 Sears after surgery for reasons not connected with the disease, 1 (5%) died from suppurative cholangitis 6 months after surgery, 2 (10%) had recurrent stones and were treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy and endoscopic stone removal, while the remaining 13 patients (65%) are symptom-free at follow-up which varied between 6 months and 11 years, Liver resection is the treatment of choice when IHL is confined to one lobe of the liver. When IHL affects the entire liver, a resection of the main involved area should be performed whenever possible. Other options include hepatoduodenal anastomosis using the interposed jejunal loop to enable endoscopic or combined treatment of recurrent stones
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Intrahepatic Lithiasis.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 57.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
57.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/22226
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact