This paper offers a deep review of the contemporary economic literature on the effects of changes in labour market institutions, employment protection in particular, on labour market performances and growth. It makes a detailed comparison between the Neo Keynesian approach and the Post Keynesian one showing that while Post Keynesian scholars share a critical view of the ineffectiveness of labour market deregulation, the Neo Keynesian paradigm contains contrasting conclusions aboutthe outcomes of flexibility. Nevertheless, international organizations (oecd in particular), often formulate their studies and policy recommendations neglecting thecomplexity of the scientific debate.
The employment protection controversy in the years of labour market reforms (1990-2014)
PACELLA, Andrea;
2016-01-01
Abstract
This paper offers a deep review of the contemporary economic literature on the effects of changes in labour market institutions, employment protection in particular, on labour market performances and growth. It makes a detailed comparison between the Neo Keynesian approach and the Post Keynesian one showing that while Post Keynesian scholars share a critical view of the ineffectiveness of labour market deregulation, the Neo Keynesian paradigm contains contrasting conclusions aboutthe outcomes of flexibility. Nevertheless, international organizations (oecd in particular), often formulate their studies and policy recommendations neglecting thecomplexity of the scientific debate.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
History of Economic Ideas2016.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
968.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
968.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.