AimsTo assess the incremental value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DTE) over contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), compared with contrast transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the identification of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Methods and Results: Eighty-one consecutive patients with history of migraine headache (MH) or unexplained cerebrovascular events (CE) were examined using RT-3DTE, contrast TTE, and contrast TEE in sequence. Feasibility of RT-3DE in patients with MH and CE was 98 and 91, respectively. Mean time for 3D colour data set acquisition was 9 ± 5 min. PFO was diagnosed using contrast TEE in 36 patients (overall prevalence = 44). Diagnostic accuracy of RT-3DE was significantly higher than that of contrast TTE: sensitivity 83 vs. 44, P < 0.001; specificity 100 vs. 100, P7 = NS; positive predictive value 100 vs. 100, P = NS; negative predictive value 88 vs. 69, P < 0.01; accuracy 93 vs. 75, P < 0.003. Five of the six patients in whom RT-3DTE did not identify PFOs showed a defect diameter smaller than 2 mm. Conclusion: RT-3DTE is a feasible, accurate, and reproducible technique to detect PFO without the need of saline contrast injection. Its accuracy is superior to contrast 2D TTE and close to that of contrast TEE.
Head-to-head comparison of real-time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography with transthoracic and transesophageal two-dimensional contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale
MONTE, INES PAOLA;
2010-01-01
Abstract
AimsTo assess the incremental value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DTE) over contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), compared with contrast transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the identification of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Methods and Results: Eighty-one consecutive patients with history of migraine headache (MH) or unexplained cerebrovascular events (CE) were examined using RT-3DTE, contrast TTE, and contrast TEE in sequence. Feasibility of RT-3DE in patients with MH and CE was 98 and 91, respectively. Mean time for 3D colour data set acquisition was 9 ± 5 min. PFO was diagnosed using contrast TEE in 36 patients (overall prevalence = 44). Diagnostic accuracy of RT-3DE was significantly higher than that of contrast TTE: sensitivity 83 vs. 44, P < 0.001; specificity 100 vs. 100, P7 = NS; positive predictive value 100 vs. 100, P = NS; negative predictive value 88 vs. 69, P < 0.01; accuracy 93 vs. 75, P < 0.003. Five of the six patients in whom RT-3DTE did not identify PFOs showed a defect diameter smaller than 2 mm. Conclusion: RT-3DTE is a feasible, accurate, and reproducible technique to detect PFO without the need of saline contrast injection. Its accuracy is superior to contrast 2D TTE and close to that of contrast TEE.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PFO_EJE.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
153.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
153.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


