The genetic diversity of Phytophthora spp. was investigated in potted ornamental and fruit tree species. A metabarcoding approach was used, based on a semi-nested PCR with Phytophthora genus-specific primers targeting the ITS1 region of the rDNA. More than 50 ITS1 sequence types representing at least 15 distinct Phytophthora taxa were detected. Nine had ITS sequences that grouped them in defined taxonomic groups (P. nicotianae, P. citrophthora, P. meadii, P. taxon Pgchlamydo, P. cinnamomi, P. parvispora, P. cambivora, P. niederhauserii and P. lateralis) whereas three phylotypes were associated to two or more taxa (P. citricola taxon E or III; P. pseudosyringae, P. ilicis or P. nemorosa; and P. cryptogea, P. erythroseptica, P. himalayensis or P. sp. ‘kelmania’) that can be challenging to resolve with ITS1 sequences alone. Three additional phylotypes were considered as representatives of novel Phytophthora taxa and defined as P. meadii-like, P. cinnamomi-like and P. niederhauserii-like. Furthermore, the analyses highlighted a very complex assemblage of Phytophthora taxa in ornamental nurseries within a limited geographic area and provided some indications of structure amongst populations of P. nicotianae (the most prevalent taxon) and other taxa. Data revealed new host–pathogen combinations, evidence of new species previously unreported in Italy (P. lateralis) or Europe (P. meadii) and phylotypes representative of species that remain to be taxonomically defined. Furthermore, the results reinforced the primary role of plant nurseries in favouring the introduction, dissemination and evolution of Phytophthora species.

Molecular analysis of Phytophthora diversity in nursery-grown ornamental and fruit plants

CACCIOLA, Santa Olga;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The genetic diversity of Phytophthora spp. was investigated in potted ornamental and fruit tree species. A metabarcoding approach was used, based on a semi-nested PCR with Phytophthora genus-specific primers targeting the ITS1 region of the rDNA. More than 50 ITS1 sequence types representing at least 15 distinct Phytophthora taxa were detected. Nine had ITS sequences that grouped them in defined taxonomic groups (P. nicotianae, P. citrophthora, P. meadii, P. taxon Pgchlamydo, P. cinnamomi, P. parvispora, P. cambivora, P. niederhauserii and P. lateralis) whereas three phylotypes were associated to two or more taxa (P. citricola taxon E or III; P. pseudosyringae, P. ilicis or P. nemorosa; and P. cryptogea, P. erythroseptica, P. himalayensis or P. sp. ‘kelmania’) that can be challenging to resolve with ITS1 sequences alone. Three additional phylotypes were considered as representatives of novel Phytophthora taxa and defined as P. meadii-like, P. cinnamomi-like and P. niederhauserii-like. Furthermore, the analyses highlighted a very complex assemblage of Phytophthora taxa in ornamental nurseries within a limited geographic area and provided some indications of structure amongst populations of P. nicotianae (the most prevalent taxon) and other taxa. Data revealed new host–pathogen combinations, evidence of new species previously unreported in Italy (P. lateralis) or Europe (P. meadii) and phylotypes representative of species that remain to be taxonomically defined. Furthermore, the results reinforced the primary role of plant nurseries in favouring the introduction, dissemination and evolution of Phytophthora species.
2015
genus-specific primers; metabarcoding analyses; nurseries; Phytophthora spp.; potted plants
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015 Prigigallo et al. Plant Pathol..pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 454.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
454.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/31058
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact