Objectives: To apply the Delphi exercise with iterative involvement of radiologists and pulmonologists with the aim of defining a structured reporting template for high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of patients with fibrosing lung disease (FLD). Methods: The writing committee selected the HRCT criteriaâ the Delphi itemsâ for rating from both radiology panelists (RP) and pulmonology panelists (PP). The Delphi items were first rated by RPs as â essentialâ , â optionalâ , or â not relevantâ . The items rated â essentialâ by < 80% of the RP were selected for the PP rating. The format of reporting was rated by both RP and PP. Results: A total of 42 RPs and 12 PPs participated to the survey. In both Delphi round 1 and 2, 10/27 (37.7%) items were rated â essentialâ by more than 80% of RP. The remaining 17/27 (63.3%) items were rated by the PP in round 3, with 2/17 items (11.7%) rated â essentialâ by the PP. PP proposed additional items for conclusion domain, which were rated by RPs in the fourth round. Poor consensus was observed for the format of reporting. Conclusions: This study provides a template for structured report of FLD that features essential items as agreed by expert thoracic radiologists and pulmonologists.
Structured reporting for fibrosing lung disease: a model shared by radiologist and pulmonologist
Palmucci, Stefano;Vancheri, Carlo;
2018-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: To apply the Delphi exercise with iterative involvement of radiologists and pulmonologists with the aim of defining a structured reporting template for high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of patients with fibrosing lung disease (FLD). Methods: The writing committee selected the HRCT criteriaâ the Delphi itemsâ for rating from both radiology panelists (RP) and pulmonology panelists (PP). The Delphi items were first rated by RPs as â essentialâ , â optionalâ , or â not relevantâ . The items rated â essentialâ by < 80% of the RP were selected for the PP rating. The format of reporting was rated by both RP and PP. Results: A total of 42 RPs and 12 PPs participated to the survey. In both Delphi round 1 and 2, 10/27 (37.7%) items were rated â essentialâ by more than 80% of RP. The remaining 17/27 (63.3%) items were rated by the PP in round 3, with 2/17 items (11.7%) rated â essentialâ by the PP. PP proposed additional items for conclusion domain, which were rated by RPs in the fourth round. Poor consensus was observed for the format of reporting. Conclusions: This study provides a template for structured report of FLD that features essential items as agreed by expert thoracic radiologists and pulmonologists.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Structured-reporting-for-fibrosing-lung-disease-a-model-shared-by-radiologist-and-pulmonologist2018Radiologia-Medica.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
910.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
910.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.