Of the numerous erudite interpretations of Catullus’s poem 67 suggested by Humanist and Renaissance scholars, many were often based on textual conjectures that were interesting but paleographically unlikely: among such suggestions, a conjecture on l. 32, erroneously attributed to Angelo Colocci and Bernardo Pisano during the nineteenth century, can be traced to unpublished marginalia by the Florentine Humanist Francesco Pucci (1463-1512). His interpretation of poem 67 seems to take into account a historical and antiquarian reading of ll. 32–34, a passage discussed at length by Humanists in Brescia and Verona.

I marginalia di Francesco Pucci al carme 67 di Catullo

Portuese Orazio
2013-01-01

Abstract

Of the numerous erudite interpretations of Catullus’s poem 67 suggested by Humanist and Renaissance scholars, many were often based on textual conjectures that were interesting but paleographically unlikely: among such suggestions, a conjecture on l. 32, erroneously attributed to Angelo Colocci and Bernardo Pisano during the nineteenth century, can be traced to unpublished marginalia by the Florentine Humanist Francesco Pucci (1463-1512). His interpretation of poem 67 seems to take into account a historical and antiquarian reading of ll. 32–34, a passage discussed at length by Humanists in Brescia and Verona.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
O. Portuese, I marginalia di Francesco Pucci al carme 67 di Catullo, 'RFIC' 141, 2013.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 227.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/321508
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact