Of the numerous erudite interpretations of Catullus’s poem 67 suggested by Humanist and Renaissance scholars, many were often based on textual conjectures that were interesting but paleographically unlikely: among such suggestions, a conjecture on l. 32, erroneously attributed to Angelo Colocci and Bernardo Pisano during the nineteenth century, can be traced to unpublished marginalia by the Florentine Humanist Francesco Pucci (1463-1512). His interpretation of poem 67 seems to take into account a historical and antiquarian reading of ll. 32–34, a passage discussed at length by Humanists in Brescia and Verona.
I marginalia di Francesco Pucci al carme 67 di Catullo
Portuese Orazio
2013-01-01
Abstract
Of the numerous erudite interpretations of Catullus’s poem 67 suggested by Humanist and Renaissance scholars, many were often based on textual conjectures that were interesting but paleographically unlikely: among such suggestions, a conjecture on l. 32, erroneously attributed to Angelo Colocci and Bernardo Pisano during the nineteenth century, can be traced to unpublished marginalia by the Florentine Humanist Francesco Pucci (1463-1512). His interpretation of poem 67 seems to take into account a historical and antiquarian reading of ll. 32–34, a passage discussed at length by Humanists in Brescia and Verona.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
O. Portuese, I marginalia di Francesco Pucci al carme 67 di Catullo, 'RFIC' 141, 2013.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
227.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
227.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.