This study investigates the size, shape, position, pre-transport setting and long-axis orientation of 175boulders found along the south-eastern Ionian coast of Sicily. These megaclasts were deposited by the sea ormoved from the same rocky coast to the shore platform and distributed within 60 m of the shoreline. Mostboulders are rectangular to ellipsoidal, with sharp, broken edges. They are calcarenite fragments up to 27 t in mass. Some of the boulders (up to 32 m from shore) were observed to have moved after strong winterstorms occurring during December 2008–January 2009, whereas the positions of many boulders were unchanged.We use wave transport equations jointly with statistical analysis of boulders in order to determine the extreme events – geological or meteorological – responsible for these singular accumulations. Using thesignificant wave height and period of maximum observed storms and historical tsunamis (1693 and 1908 events) along the Ionian coast of Sicily, we have estimated the approximate transport distance of boulders by these waves at the coast. Results show that the largest storm waves were probably responsible for thecurrent distribution of most boulders. However, since the size and horizontal displacement distance of someboulders scattered randomly along the shoreline at distance >40 m cannot be explained by storm waveaction, we suggest that they are likely deposited by tsunamis. Radiocarbon dating performed on three of these anomalous boulders, at a distance N40 m from the shoreline, gave an age suggesting that two of themwere likely deposited by the 1693 or 1908 tsunamis, whereas the third was emplaced by a tsunami thatoccurred after 650–930 A.D.We show that both wave processes (storm and tsunami) can deposit boulders. We find that the significantdifference between storm and tsunami waves is not the breaking wave height but the wave period that influences attenuation, and then the flooding distance. Hence, if the boulder-transport limit of the largest storm waves in the past at the study area is estimated, then it is possible to recognize that the boulders deposited far beyond this limit, because of their size and shape, were not transported by storm waves, but could have been emplaced by waves with longer period, such as the tsunamis.

Large boulders along the south-eastern Ionian coast of Sicily: storm or tsunami deposits?

BARBANO, Maria Serafina;PIRROTTA, CLAUDIA;
2010-01-01

Abstract

This study investigates the size, shape, position, pre-transport setting and long-axis orientation of 175boulders found along the south-eastern Ionian coast of Sicily. These megaclasts were deposited by the sea ormoved from the same rocky coast to the shore platform and distributed within 60 m of the shoreline. Mostboulders are rectangular to ellipsoidal, with sharp, broken edges. They are calcarenite fragments up to 27 t in mass. Some of the boulders (up to 32 m from shore) were observed to have moved after strong winterstorms occurring during December 2008–January 2009, whereas the positions of many boulders were unchanged.We use wave transport equations jointly with statistical analysis of boulders in order to determine the extreme events – geological or meteorological – responsible for these singular accumulations. Using thesignificant wave height and period of maximum observed storms and historical tsunamis (1693 and 1908 events) along the Ionian coast of Sicily, we have estimated the approximate transport distance of boulders by these waves at the coast. Results show that the largest storm waves were probably responsible for thecurrent distribution of most boulders. However, since the size and horizontal displacement distance of someboulders scattered randomly along the shoreline at distance >40 m cannot be explained by storm waveaction, we suggest that they are likely deposited by tsunamis. Radiocarbon dating performed on three of these anomalous boulders, at a distance N40 m from the shoreline, gave an age suggesting that two of themwere likely deposited by the 1693 or 1908 tsunamis, whereas the third was emplaced by a tsunami thatoccurred after 650–930 A.D.We show that both wave processes (storm and tsunami) can deposit boulders. We find that the significantdifference between storm and tsunami waves is not the breaking wave height but the wave period that influences attenuation, and then the flooding distance. Hence, if the boulder-transport limit of the largest storm waves in the past at the study area is estimated, then it is possible to recognize that the boulders deposited far beyond this limit, because of their size and shape, were not transported by storm waves, but could have been emplaced by waves with longer period, such as the tsunamis.
2010
boulders; storm wave; tsunami; flooding; coastal hazards; Italy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
barbanoetal2010margeoboulders.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.52 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.52 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/33583
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 137
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 120
social impact