Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) history is characterized by episodes of exacerbation of varying severity, featured by acute worsening of respiratory symptoms, commonly precipitated by respiratory tract infection. The recent ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines strongly recommend the application of non invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) leading to acute or acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis (pH 7.35) and not for those patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and hypercapnia who are not acidotic. In recent years, High-Flow through Nasal Cannula (HFNC) has been introduced in the clinical practice. We designed the present systematic review of the literature to assess all effects of HFNC use reported in exacerbated COPD patients. In this setting, HFNC is able to keep PaCO2 unmodified, while oxygenation slightly deteriorates as opposed to NIV. Furthermore, the work of breathing is reduced with HFNC by a similar extent to NIV, while it increases by 40–50% during conventional oxygen therapy (COT). HFNC is also reported to be more comfortable than COT and NIV. Despite these results, little and limited evidence for improved clinical outcomes is currently available.

High flow through nasal cannula in exacerbated COPD patients: a systematic review

Astuto M.;
2019

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) history is characterized by episodes of exacerbation of varying severity, featured by acute worsening of respiratory symptoms, commonly precipitated by respiratory tract infection. The recent ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines strongly recommend the application of non invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) leading to acute or acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis (pH 7.35) and not for those patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and hypercapnia who are not acidotic. In recent years, High-Flow through Nasal Cannula (HFNC) has been introduced in the clinical practice. We designed the present systematic review of the literature to assess all effects of HFNC use reported in exacerbated COPD patients. In this setting, HFNC is able to keep PaCO2 unmodified, while oxygenation slightly deteriorates as opposed to NIV. Furthermore, the work of breathing is reduced with HFNC by a similar extent to NIV, while it increases by 40–50% during conventional oxygen therapy (COT). HFNC is also reported to be more comfortable than COT and NIV. Despite these results, little and limited evidence for improved clinical outcomes is currently available.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; High flow nasal cannula; Hypercapnia; Non-invasive ventilation; Oxygen; Positive-pressure respiration; Respiratory insufficiency; Respiratory therapy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2531043719301631-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 454.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
454.93 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/372340
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact