The particularity of paternity cases justifies a disarticulation of the relevance of the child’s best interests: disarticulation that could be placed on the crest not only of the effects, distinguishing between relational and patrimonial profiles, but also of the purposes of those who proposed the action, distinguishing between coincident or concordant positions and conflicting positions to that of the child.
Sommario: 1. La cornice tradizionale. – 2. I presupposti per una lettura evolutiva. – 3. Le ragioni ostative alla lettura evolutiva. – 4. Una proposta di disarticolazione: gli interessi privati concordanti. – 5. Segue. Gli interessi privati contrapposti. – 6. Qualche breve considerazione sulla rilevanza degli interessi pubblici.
Azioni di stato, interesse del minore e ricerca della verità
ugo salanitro
2019-01-01
Abstract
The particularity of paternity cases justifies a disarticulation of the relevance of the child’s best interests: disarticulation that could be placed on the crest not only of the effects, distinguishing between relational and patrimonial profiles, but also of the purposes of those who proposed the action, distinguishing between coincident or concordant positions and conflicting positions to that of the child.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SALANITRO(3).pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
219.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
219.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.