Purpose – The internet of things (IoT) is one of the pillars of IndustryQ1 4.0. Prior OM research has conceptualizedIoT,andanalyzedpotentialapplicationsandrisksandchallengesassociatedwithitsadoption. However,littleempiricalevidenceexistsonthemaintypesofIoTprojectsundertakenbyorganizationandon their impacts. The purpose of this paper is to close this gap by searching for a taxonomy of IoT projects that maybeassociatedtodifferentIoTreadinesslevels.Thedynamiccapability(DC)lensisusedasthetheoretical background for the analysis. Design/methodology/approach – A database of secondary IoT case studies is used to identify an IoT project taxonomy through two-step cluster analysis. The taxonomy obtained allows classifying projects into homogenousgroupsbytechnologicalnovelty,IoTcapabilitiesandfunctionalareasofapplication.ANOVAis thenusedtotestfortheassociationbetweenclustermembershipandalternativeoperationalimpacts.Finally, the analysis of selected case studies from the database allows throwing light on the nature of the projects typical of each cluster. Findings – Fiveclustersofprojectshavebeen identifiedand positionedalong varyingdegreesofcapabilities, noveltyandscope.ThetaxonomyisconsistentwithathreelayerIoTtechnologicalreadinessmodel.Inturn,the three IoT readiness levels correspond to three managerial capabilities: monitoring, control and optimization. Combining cluster results with detailed case analysis suggests that IoT technological readiness can be interpreted as a DC which enables knowledge creation that can support competitive advantage. Originality/value – This is a first attempt to describe projects firms undertake when adopting IoT. Building on cluster analysis, the study suggests that different IoT readiness levels are needed to reach different impacts.

Internet of things adoption: a typology of projects

Ancarani, Alessandro;Di Mauro, Carmela;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – The internet of things (IoT) is one of the pillars of IndustryQ1 4.0. Prior OM research has conceptualizedIoT,andanalyzedpotentialapplicationsandrisksandchallengesassociatedwithitsadoption. However,littleempiricalevidenceexistsonthemaintypesofIoTprojectsundertakenbyorganizationandon their impacts. The purpose of this paper is to close this gap by searching for a taxonomy of IoT projects that maybeassociatedtodifferentIoTreadinesslevels.Thedynamiccapability(DC)lensisusedasthetheoretical background for the analysis. Design/methodology/approach – A database of secondary IoT case studies is used to identify an IoT project taxonomy through two-step cluster analysis. The taxonomy obtained allows classifying projects into homogenousgroupsbytechnologicalnovelty,IoTcapabilitiesandfunctionalareasofapplication.ANOVAis thenusedtotestfortheassociationbetweenclustermembershipandalternativeoperationalimpacts.Finally, the analysis of selected case studies from the database allows throwing light on the nature of the projects typical of each cluster. Findings – Fiveclustersofprojectshavebeen identifiedand positionedalong varyingdegreesofcapabilities, noveltyandscope.ThetaxonomyisconsistentwithathreelayerIoTtechnologicalreadinessmodel.Inturn,the three IoT readiness levels correspond to three managerial capabilities: monitoring, control and optimization. Combining cluster results with detailed case analysis suggests that IoT technological readiness can be interpreted as a DC which enables knowledge creation that can support competitive advantage. Originality/value – This is a first attempt to describe projects firms undertake when adopting IoT. Building on cluster analysis, the study suggests that different IoT readiness levels are needed to reach different impacts.
2020
innovation, Industry 4.0
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/392911
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact