Recently, minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has gained wide consensus in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its role in the setting of a salvage liver transplantation (SLT) has been poorly investigated. We analyzed the intention-to-treat survival of HCC patients treated with MILS vs. the open approach and eventually waitlisted for SLT. The secondary end-point was identification of risk factors for post-transplant death and tumor recurrence.
The role of salvage transplantation in patients initially treated with open vs minimally invasive liver surgery: an intention-to-treat analysis
DI Benedetto, Fabrizio;Gruttadauria, Salvatore;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Recently, minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has gained wide consensus in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its role in the setting of a salvage liver transplantation (SLT) has been poorly investigated. We analyzed the intention-to-treat survival of HCC patients treated with MILS vs. the open approach and eventually waitlisted for SLT. The secondary end-point was identification of risk factors for post-transplant death and tumor recurrence.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
lt. S.G. 2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione
1.31 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.31 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
