The paper provides a first comment on the 5 May 2020 Bundesverfassungsgerich’s decision on the “Quantitative Easing” program undertaken by the European Central Bank since 2015. Within a brief comparison with other occasions of “judicial dialogue” between the European Court of Justice and national constitutional Courts, the analysis points out some contradictions, not to say true paradoxes, of the German judgement.

The 5 May 2020 Bundesverfassungsgericht's Decision on the ECB’s public sector purchase program: an attempt to "break the toy" or a new starting point for the Eurozone?

CIANCIO A.
2020-01-01

Abstract

The paper provides a first comment on the 5 May 2020 Bundesverfassungsgerich’s decision on the “Quantitative Easing” program undertaken by the European Central Bank since 2015. Within a brief comparison with other occasions of “judicial dialogue” between the European Court of Justice and national constitutional Courts, the analysis points out some contradictions, not to say true paradoxes, of the German judgement.
2020
Judicial dialogue; preliminary reference; constitutional identity; european integration; monetary policy; monetary union; democratic legitimacy; ECB; Quantitative Easing; Bundesverfassungsgericht; constitutional pluralism; sovereignty
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BverfG5May.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 693.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
693.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/432253
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact