To assess and compare spontaneous expansion of mandibular posterior teeth between tooth-borne (TB) and bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Materials and Methods: This study included 36 adolescents with bilateral maxillary crossbite receiving tooth-borne (average age: 14.4 6 1.3 years) or bone-borne (average age: 14.7 6 1.4 years) maxillary expansion. Cone beam computed tomography was acquired before expansion (T1) and after 6 months’ retention (T2). Specific linear and angular measurements were performed in the coronal view to assess buccal inclinations and widths of mandibular posterior units. All data were statistically analyzed. Results: In both groups there was a significant increase in buccal-lingual inclination of mandibular posterior teeth ranging from 1.678 to 2.308 in the TB group and from 1.468 to 2.118 in BB group. Mandibular posterior widths showed an increase ranging from 0.80 mm to 1.33 mm in TB group and from 0.64 mm to 0.96 mm in the BB group. No differences between groups were found for linear or angular measurements. Conclusions: A clinically significant gain of space in the mandibular arch should not be expected after RME.

Transverse dentoalveolar response of mandibular arch after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with tooth-borne and bone-borne appliances: A CBCT retrospective study

Lo Giudice Antonino
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Leonardi Rosalia
Conceptualization
;
Isola Gaetano
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2020-01-01

Abstract

To assess and compare spontaneous expansion of mandibular posterior teeth between tooth-borne (TB) and bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Materials and Methods: This study included 36 adolescents with bilateral maxillary crossbite receiving tooth-borne (average age: 14.4 6 1.3 years) or bone-borne (average age: 14.7 6 1.4 years) maxillary expansion. Cone beam computed tomography was acquired before expansion (T1) and after 6 months’ retention (T2). Specific linear and angular measurements were performed in the coronal view to assess buccal inclinations and widths of mandibular posterior units. All data were statistically analyzed. Results: In both groups there was a significant increase in buccal-lingual inclination of mandibular posterior teeth ranging from 1.678 to 2.308 in the TB group and from 1.468 to 2.118 in BB group. Mandibular posterior widths showed an increase ranging from 0.80 mm to 1.33 mm in TB group and from 0.64 mm to 0.96 mm in the BB group. No differences between groups were found for linear or angular measurements. Conclusions: A clinically significant gain of space in the mandibular arch should not be expected after RME.
2020
RME; Tooth-borne RME; Bone-borne RME; Arch expansion; Dentoalveolar effects
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lo Giudice et al 2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 407.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
407.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/465282
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact