Objectives: Many clinical laboratories have difficulty in routinely performing in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing using the agar dilution (AD) method, considered to be the gold standard method. The objective of our work was to evaluate a rapid commercial fosfomycin agar dilution panel against clinical Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales strains, in two different centres located in Italy and in the UK. Methods: A total of 99 Enterobacterales (mostly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 80 S. aureus clinical isolates was used to evaluate the commercial device, a 12-well panel containing fosfomycin incorporated into CA-MH agar supplemented with 25mg/L of glucose-6-phosphate (Liofilchem S.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Testing was performed in two centres (Italy and UK) and kit results were compared against the gold standard in-house AD MIC method. Results: According to the EUCAST breakpoints, fosfomycin inhibited 61% of the S. aureus strains, and 76% of the Enterobacterales isolates tested by the AD reference method. There was a Categorical Agreement (CA) of 100% and an Essential Agreement (EA) of 91.25% for S. aureus; while the Enterobacterales strains showed a CA of 94% and an EA of 97%. No evaluation errors were observed among S. aureus, while 5% Major Error and 1% Very Major Error were observed for the Enterobacterales. Conclusions: Our results confirmed the feasibility of determining fosfomycin susceptibility using a commercial AD panel as a routine substitution for the AD test. The few differences observed were only in strains with MICs around the breakpoint used.

Gold standard susceptibility testing of fosfomycin in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales using a new agar dilution panel®

Campanile, Floriana;Aprile, Ausilia;Mirabile, Alessia;Bongiorno, Dafne;Stefani, Stefania;Mezzatesta, Maria Lina
2020-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: Many clinical laboratories have difficulty in routinely performing in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing using the agar dilution (AD) method, considered to be the gold standard method. The objective of our work was to evaluate a rapid commercial fosfomycin agar dilution panel against clinical Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales strains, in two different centres located in Italy and in the UK. Methods: A total of 99 Enterobacterales (mostly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 80 S. aureus clinical isolates was used to evaluate the commercial device, a 12-well panel containing fosfomycin incorporated into CA-MH agar supplemented with 25mg/L of glucose-6-phosphate (Liofilchem S.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Testing was performed in two centres (Italy and UK) and kit results were compared against the gold standard in-house AD MIC method. Results: According to the EUCAST breakpoints, fosfomycin inhibited 61% of the S. aureus strains, and 76% of the Enterobacterales isolates tested by the AD reference method. There was a Categorical Agreement (CA) of 100% and an Essential Agreement (EA) of 91.25% for S. aureus; while the Enterobacterales strains showed a CA of 94% and an EA of 97%. No evaluation errors were observed among S. aureus, while 5% Major Error and 1% Very Major Error were observed for the Enterobacterales. Conclusions: Our results confirmed the feasibility of determining fosfomycin susceptibility using a commercial AD panel as a routine substitution for the AD test. The few differences observed were only in strains with MICs around the breakpoint used.
2020
Agar dilution
Commercial AD panel
Enterobacterales
Fosfomycin
Staphylococcus aureus
Agar
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Italy
Staphylococcus aureus
Fosfomycin
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gold standard jgar.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 907.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
907.83 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/524318
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact