Purpose To analyze and compare surgical and audiological outcomes of conventional approaches versus laser CO2 surgery in stapes surgery. Methods 333 patients who underwent stapes surgery were enrolled in the study; the patient population was divided into three groups: group 1: 170 patients treated with conventional stapedotomy with manual microdrill (average age 49.13 years); group 2: 119 patients treated with conventional stapedotomy with electrical microdrill (average age 51.06 years); group 3: 44 patients (average age 50.4 years) who underwent CO2 laser stapedotomy. Intra-operative, postoperative outcomes and audiological results were investigated. Results The average surgical time of laser CO2 surgery was longer than for other surgical procedures. No statistical differ- ences emerged in post-operative abnormal taste sensation. There was also no difference in postoperative dizziness. Air-bone gap (ABG) went down from 29.7 ± 10 dB (group 1) and 27.32 ± 9.20 (group 2) to 10 ± 6.9 dB (group 1) and 10.7 ± 6.03 dB (group 2). In group 3 the preoperative ABG was lowered from 28.3 ± 10.1 to 11.8 ± 10.9, with a statistical difference in audi- tory recovery (p = 0.0001); The group of patients treated with laser CO2 showed a percentage of patients with an ABG closure of between 0 and 10 dB higher than in the group treated with manual microdrills (77.2% vs. 60%, respectively; p = 0.03). Conclusion Overall surgical results of CO2 laser and conventional stapedotomy are comparable without any significant dif- ference; however, the group treated with CO2 laser appears to have a percentage of patients with an ABG closure 0–10 dB higher than the group treated using the conventional technique.

Conventional approaches versus laser CO2 surgery in stapes surgery: a multicentre retrospective study

Antonino Maniaci
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Salvatore Cocuzza
Conceptualization
;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Purpose To analyze and compare surgical and audiological outcomes of conventional approaches versus laser CO2 surgery in stapes surgery. Methods 333 patients who underwent stapes surgery were enrolled in the study; the patient population was divided into three groups: group 1: 170 patients treated with conventional stapedotomy with manual microdrill (average age 49.13 years); group 2: 119 patients treated with conventional stapedotomy with electrical microdrill (average age 51.06 years); group 3: 44 patients (average age 50.4 years) who underwent CO2 laser stapedotomy. Intra-operative, postoperative outcomes and audiological results were investigated. Results The average surgical time of laser CO2 surgery was longer than for other surgical procedures. No statistical differ- ences emerged in post-operative abnormal taste sensation. There was also no difference in postoperative dizziness. Air-bone gap (ABG) went down from 29.7 ± 10 dB (group 1) and 27.32 ± 9.20 (group 2) to 10 ± 6.9 dB (group 1) and 10.7 ± 6.03 dB (group 2). In group 3 the preoperative ABG was lowered from 28.3 ± 10.1 to 11.8 ± 10.9, with a statistical difference in audi- tory recovery (p = 0.0001); The group of patients treated with laser CO2 showed a percentage of patients with an ABG closure of between 0 and 10 dB higher than in the group treated with manual microdrills (77.2% vs. 60%, respectively; p = 0.03). Conclusion Overall surgical results of CO2 laser and conventional stapedotomy are comparable without any significant dif- ference; however, the group treated with CO2 laser appears to have a percentage of patients with an ABG closure 0–10 dB higher than the group treated using the conventional technique.
2022
Stapes surgery · Otosclerosis · Stapes · Stapedotomy · Laser stapedotomy · Laser stapes surgery
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Conventional approaches versus laser CO2 surgery in stapes surgery a multicentre retrospective study.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 588.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
588.57 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/527549
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact