This is an article about a contested syndrome as a type of posttraumatic stress disorder. Its proponents claim that the abortion procedure causes per se detrimental effects on women’s mental health. Although the postabortion syndrome has been debunked by experts, it still resonates into antiabortion claims expressed by ordinary speakers. I will analyze its political and philosophical implications.
DISACCORDO E LIBERTÀ DI ESPRESSIONE. IL CASO DELL’ABORTO TRAUMATICO.
Maria Rosaria Vitale
2021-01-01
Abstract
This is an article about a contested syndrome as a type of posttraumatic stress disorder. Its proponents claim that the abortion procedure causes per se detrimental effects on women’s mental health. Although the postabortion syndrome has been debunked by experts, it still resonates into antiabortion claims expressed by ordinary speakers. I will analyze its political and philosophical implications.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
DISACCORDO E LIBERTÀ DI ESPRESSIONE. IL CASO DELL’ABORTO TRAUMATICO Vitale.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
555.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
555.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.