Objective To evaluate the antipsychotic drug prescribing pattern in the Italian general population, elderly and especially elderly with dementia, in relation to the safety warnings issued by international regulatory agencies about the risk of cerebrovascular adverse events and mortality in 2004 and 2005. Methods A cohort study was conducted using the electronic medical records of the Italian general practice database “Health Search/Thales”. Based on prescription data, one-year and monthly prevalence estimates were calculated for atypical and typical antipsychotic use in general population, elderly and elderly demented outpatients. One-year prevalence of individual medication use in elderly demented patients was calculated as well. Results The prevalence of use of atypical agents in demented patients progressively increased from 2000 [0.2 (0.05-0.7) per 10,000] until the beginning of 2004 [9.7 (8.1-11.6) per 10,000], after which a slight decrease started, while the prevalence of use of typical antipsychotics decreased from 2001 [15.7 (13.5-18.2) per 10,000] until 2004 [10.7 (9.0- 12.7) per 10,000], then slightly increasing in the following years [12.1 (10.4-14.2) per 10,000 in December 2005]. Monthly trends in general population and elderly were quite similar and differed significantly from the trend in elderly with dementia: stable use of atypicals from 2002 to 2005 and strong reduction of typicals from 2001 to the end of 2004. Conclusion The recent safety warnings led to an increasing trend in the use of typical agents and decreasing trend for atypical agents in elderly demented outpatients in Italy. Similar trends were not observed in general population and elderly as a whole.

Prescribing pattern of antipsychotic drugs in the italian population 2000-2005: a focus on eledrly with dementia

AGUGLIA, Eugenio;
2010-01-01

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the antipsychotic drug prescribing pattern in the Italian general population, elderly and especially elderly with dementia, in relation to the safety warnings issued by international regulatory agencies about the risk of cerebrovascular adverse events and mortality in 2004 and 2005. Methods A cohort study was conducted using the electronic medical records of the Italian general practice database “Health Search/Thales”. Based on prescription data, one-year and monthly prevalence estimates were calculated for atypical and typical antipsychotic use in general population, elderly and elderly demented outpatients. One-year prevalence of individual medication use in elderly demented patients was calculated as well. Results The prevalence of use of atypical agents in demented patients progressively increased from 2000 [0.2 (0.05-0.7) per 10,000] until the beginning of 2004 [9.7 (8.1-11.6) per 10,000], after which a slight decrease started, while the prevalence of use of typical antipsychotics decreased from 2001 [15.7 (13.5-18.2) per 10,000] until 2004 [10.7 (9.0- 12.7) per 10,000], then slightly increasing in the following years [12.1 (10.4-14.2) per 10,000 in December 2005]. Monthly trends in general population and elderly were quite similar and differed significantly from the trend in elderly with dementia: stable use of atypicals from 2002 to 2005 and strong reduction of typicals from 2001 to the end of 2004. Conclusion The recent safety warnings led to an increasing trend in the use of typical agents and decreasing trend for atypical agents in elderly demented outpatients in Italy. Similar trends were not observed in general population and elderly as a whole.
2010
antipsychotic agent; safety warnings; primary health care
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AGUGLIA - ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS IN ITALIAN GENERAL POPULATION - YEARS 2000-2005.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 271.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
271.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/54052
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact