In reviewing legal acts adopted in the context of the economic-financial crisis, proportionality finds frequent application. However, case-law at both national and Union’s level displays elements of a loose proportionality review, as Courts hardly dare to challenge the substance of the decisions negotiated by law-makers. The article argues that loose proportionality is tied to a departure from the juridical roots of the referring concept, which lie in a ‘culture of justification’ as alternative to a ‘culture of authority’ in the exercise of public power. In this light, it provides analysis of the case-law concerned to show that the decisions taken at the political level do not seek their legitimacy in dialogical justification, but find it in the alleged assumption that they represent the optimal ‘reasonable solution’ for all Member States, despite the painful inequalities they entail. As they prove somehow alien to the cultural-juridical roots of the concept, they cannot undergo a fully-fledged proportionality scrutiny. Yet, this may signpost the gradual comeback of a ‘culture of authority’ requiring careful reflection, as itwouldtouchupontheveryconceptionofthe human person as capable of self-determination – arguably, the cornerstone of contemporary constitutional arrangements.

'Loose' Proportionality Review in the European Monetary Union's 'Law of the Crisis': A Sign of Decline of the Culture of Justification?

Vosa G
2020-01-01

Abstract

In reviewing legal acts adopted in the context of the economic-financial crisis, proportionality finds frequent application. However, case-law at both national and Union’s level displays elements of a loose proportionality review, as Courts hardly dare to challenge the substance of the decisions negotiated by law-makers. The article argues that loose proportionality is tied to a departure from the juridical roots of the referring concept, which lie in a ‘culture of justification’ as alternative to a ‘culture of authority’ in the exercise of public power. In this light, it provides analysis of the case-law concerned to show that the decisions taken at the political level do not seek their legitimacy in dialogical justification, but find it in the alleged assumption that they represent the optimal ‘reasonable solution’ for all Member States, despite the painful inequalities they entail. As they prove somehow alien to the cultural-juridical roots of the concept, they cannot undergo a fully-fledged proportionality scrutiny. Yet, this may signpost the gradual comeback of a ‘culture of authority’ requiring careful reflection, as itwouldtouchupontheveryconceptionofthe human person as capable of self-determination – arguably, the cornerstone of contemporary constitutional arrangements.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
3_VOSA_EPL_Loose Proportionality.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 172.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
172.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/544264
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact