A recommendation in publication of the revised ISHLT 2004 classification for acute cardiac allograft rejection was that it should be audited for reproducibility, shown to have been a problem with the 1990 system. A pilot study devised to test a web-based system for assessment of interobserver reproducibility of the ISHLT 2004 system after three years’ use, highlights its strengths and weaknesses and compare it to the 1990 grading scheme
A web-based pilot study of inter-pathologist reproducibility using the ISHLT 2004 working formulation for biopsy diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection: the European experience
BARTOLONI, Giovanni;
2011-01-01
Abstract
A recommendation in publication of the revised ISHLT 2004 classification for acute cardiac allograft rejection was that it should be audited for reproducibility, shown to have been a problem with the 1990 system. A pilot study devised to test a web-based system for assessment of interobserver reproducibility of the ISHLT 2004 system after three years’ use, highlights its strengths and weaknesses and compare it to the 1990 grading schemeFile in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
WeBPilotStudyAngelini.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
63.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
63.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
