Background Recovery of olfactory function plays a prominent role in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). While rates and timing of such recovery vary, monoclonal antibodies might yield better results which we aimed at evaluating with this study. Methodology A prospective controlled study was conducted at our tertiary otolaryngological center from April 1, 2021, to October 1, 2022, in CRSwNP patients. We included an active group (n = 60 patients) performing dupilumab treatment and a control group (n = 60 patients) treated with intranasal and oral corticosteroids. Primary endpoints were changes in smell visual analogical scale (VAS) and SS-I (Sni n' Sticks-identi cation) scores, and olfactory recovery rate. The secondary e cacy endpoints were nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, headache, SNOT-22, and nasal congestion score (NCS). Results At6months,theactivegroupdemonstratedbetteroutcomesthancontrolinSS-Iscores(10.23±4.21vs.3.68±3.08; p < 0.001). No signi cant di erences were found in blood eosinophil count, SNOT-22, and NPS (p > 0.05 for all). Olfactory function in the treatment arm improved in 86.66% (52/60 cases), with normal scores in 48.33% (29/60), while the control group reported a lower recovery rate (3/60; 5%), with no normal olfaction cases. Log-rank comparison for Kaplan–Meier functions was statistically signi cant (p < 0.001), but no di erences were found in subanalysis in the active group based on blood eosinophil count at baseline, SNOT-22, and NPS scores. Conclusions Patients who receive dupilumab treatment may experience a faster recovery of olfactory function compared to those receiving corticosteroid therapy. This result would be maintained regardless of the severity of type 2 CRSwNP in am- mation, the volume of the polyps, or the patient's subjective symptomatology.

Effectiveness and rapidity on olfatory fuction recovery in CRS patients treated with Dupilumab: a real life prospective controlled study

Ignazio La Mantia
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Salvatore Cocuzza;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background Recovery of olfactory function plays a prominent role in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). While rates and timing of such recovery vary, monoclonal antibodies might yield better results which we aimed at evaluating with this study. Methodology A prospective controlled study was conducted at our tertiary otolaryngological center from April 1, 2021, to October 1, 2022, in CRSwNP patients. We included an active group (n = 60 patients) performing dupilumab treatment and a control group (n = 60 patients) treated with intranasal and oral corticosteroids. Primary endpoints were changes in smell visual analogical scale (VAS) and SS-I (Sni n' Sticks-identi cation) scores, and olfactory recovery rate. The secondary e cacy endpoints were nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, headache, SNOT-22, and nasal congestion score (NCS). Results At6months,theactivegroupdemonstratedbetteroutcomesthancontrolinSS-Iscores(10.23±4.21vs.3.68±3.08; p < 0.001). No signi cant di erences were found in blood eosinophil count, SNOT-22, and NPS (p > 0.05 for all). Olfactory function in the treatment arm improved in 86.66% (52/60 cases), with normal scores in 48.33% (29/60), while the control group reported a lower recovery rate (3/60; 5%), with no normal olfaction cases. Log-rank comparison for Kaplan–Meier functions was statistically signi cant (p < 0.001), but no di erences were found in subanalysis in the active group based on blood eosinophil count at baseline, SNOT-22, and NPS scores. Conclusions Patients who receive dupilumab treatment may experience a faster recovery of olfactory function compared to those receiving corticosteroid therapy. This result would be maintained regardless of the severity of type 2 CRSwNP in am- mation, the volume of the polyps, or the patient's subjective symptomatology.
2024
CRSwNP · Dupilumab · Type 2 In ammation · Olfactory disorders · Smell
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Effectiveness and rapidity.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: ARTICOLO IN RIVISTA
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/598731
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact