n this article I discuss some notions at the margins of the complicated and controversial relationship between the history of (legal) thought and philosophy (of law). In particular, I respond to two questions: 1) Is it possible to do “philosophy of law” disregarding its history? 2) How much history is required to do “philosophy of law”? On the basis of these considerations, I will concentrate briefly on some of Alexy’s proposals, which we will study as a paradigmatic case for a “certain way” of conceptualizing the philosophy of law and its relationship to history.

Tra antiquari e orologiai. Filosofia del diritto e dimensione storica

Andrea Porciello
2021-01-01

Abstract

n this article I discuss some notions at the margins of the complicated and controversial relationship between the history of (legal) thought and philosophy (of law). In particular, I respond to two questions: 1) Is it possible to do “philosophy of law” disregarding its history? 2) How much history is required to do “philosophy of law”? On the basis of these considerations, I will concentrate briefly on some of Alexy’s proposals, which we will study as a paradigmatic case for a “certain way” of conceptualizing the philosophy of law and its relationship to history.
2021
Neopositivism
History of Philosophy of Law
Analytical approach
Nonpositivism
Constitutionalism
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Diacronia 2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 200.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
200.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/617300
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact