Through the fundamental concepts of habitus and reflexivity, the author analyses both the heuristic role and the limits of Margaret Archer's work for the maturation of present sociological theory and for the change of the way in which the sociology studies the institution. In fact, the relative dependence between the reflexivity of the internal conversation and the reflexivity of the structures lets the sociologist choice between an "institutional" perspective and a theoretically autonomous and specifically scientific perspective.
Morfogenesi e riflessività, alcune condizioni per parlare sociologicamente delle istituzioni
PENNISI, Carlo
2007-01-01
Abstract
Through the fundamental concepts of habitus and reflexivity, the author analyses both the heuristic role and the limits of Margaret Archer's work for the maturation of present sociological theory and for the change of the way in which the sociology studies the institution. In fact, the relative dependence between the reflexivity of the internal conversation and the reflexivity of the structures lets the sociologist choice between an "institutional" perspective and a theoretically autonomous and specifically scientific perspective.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Studi di sociologia Morfogenesi e riflessività - estratto 3- 4, luglio dicembre 2006.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
821.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
821.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.