Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate torsional, dynamic, and static cyclic fatigue resistance of the reciprocating One RECI (OR; Micromega, Besancon, France), WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), rotary One Curve (OC, MicroMega), and ProTaper Next X2 (PTN X-2; Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC) instruments. Methods: A total of 120 OR (n = 30), WOG (n = 30), OC (n = 30), and PTN X2 (n = 30) nickel-titanium instruments were used. Torque and rotation angle until failure under static torsion loading were measured according to ISO 3630-1. Static and dynamic fatigue resistance was measured as the time to fracture in an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60 degrees angle and 5-mm radius of curvature at intracanal temperature. The results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test. The alpha-type error was set at 5%. Fracture instruments from torsion and fatigue tests were examined with a scanning electron microscope. Results: OR showed higher static fatigue resistance and rotation angle at fracture than WOG, OC, and PTN X2 (P <.05). WOG exhibited higher torsional resistance than the others (P <.05). The cyclic fatigue tests in dynamic mode had higher TTF than static for the PTN X2 and WOG groups (P <.05). In the dynamic tests, OR and WOG showed higher TTF than OC and PTN X2 ( P <.05). Conclusions: Under these experimental conditions, One RECI exhibited suitable mechanical properties with the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angle of rotation among the tested instruments. (J Endod 2022;48:1421-1427.)

Torsional, Static, and Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciprocating and Continuous Rotating Nickel-Titanium Instruments

Pedullà Eugenio;La Rosa G. R. M.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate torsional, dynamic, and static cyclic fatigue resistance of the reciprocating One RECI (OR; Micromega, Besancon, France), WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), rotary One Curve (OC, MicroMega), and ProTaper Next X2 (PTN X-2; Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC) instruments. Methods: A total of 120 OR (n = 30), WOG (n = 30), OC (n = 30), and PTN X2 (n = 30) nickel-titanium instruments were used. Torque and rotation angle until failure under static torsion loading were measured according to ISO 3630-1. Static and dynamic fatigue resistance was measured as the time to fracture in an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60 degrees angle and 5-mm radius of curvature at intracanal temperature. The results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test. The alpha-type error was set at 5%. Fracture instruments from torsion and fatigue tests were examined with a scanning electron microscope. Results: OR showed higher static fatigue resistance and rotation angle at fracture than WOG, OC, and PTN X2 (P <.05). WOG exhibited higher torsional resistance than the others (P <.05). The cyclic fatigue tests in dynamic mode had higher TTF than static for the PTN X2 and WOG groups (P <.05). In the dynamic tests, OR and WOG showed higher TTF than OC and PTN X2 ( P <.05). Conclusions: Under these experimental conditions, One RECI exhibited suitable mechanical properties with the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angle of rotation among the tested instruments. (J Endod 2022;48:1421-1427.)
2022
Continuous rotation
One RECI
cyclic fatigue resistance
reciprocating motion
torsional resistance
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Torsional, Static, and Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 5.75 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.75 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/625629
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact