Background: In spite of being considered the gold-standard of care, little is known about the real-life use of inhome and multidisciplinary care in atypical parkinsonism. Objective: Primary: Examine real-life multidisciplinary care use for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Secondary: a) Compare PSP care to advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) care; (b) Explore demographic and clinical variables associated with care needs in both groups. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study enrolled 129 PSP patients and 65 APD patients (Hoehn and Yahr >= 3), matched for sex and age. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed. Results: Over the previous year, 40 % of PSP patients did not encounter a physical therapist, while only one-third met a speech and language therapist and 5 % an occupational therapist. More than 20 % received in-home care and 32 % needed home structural changes. Compared to APD, PSP patients required more day-time, night-time and home structural changes. When considering both PSP and APD in multivariate analysis, reduced functional autonomy and living without a family caregiver were both related to day-time home assistance and to the need of at least one home care service. A PSP diagnosis compared to APD was a risk factor for having at least four multidisciplinary visits in a year. Finally, PSP diagnosis and being from the Northern Italy were significantly related with home structural changes. Conclusions: There's a significant gap in providing multidisciplinary care for PSP patients. Our findings emphasize the need for a shared, integrated care plan at a national level for patients with atypical parkinsonism.
Multidisciplinary care use in neurodegenerative complex diseases: The example of progressive supranuclear palsy and advanced Parkinson's disease in real-life
Nicoletti, Alessandra;Cicero, Edoardo;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Background: In spite of being considered the gold-standard of care, little is known about the real-life use of inhome and multidisciplinary care in atypical parkinsonism. Objective: Primary: Examine real-life multidisciplinary care use for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Secondary: a) Compare PSP care to advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) care; (b) Explore demographic and clinical variables associated with care needs in both groups. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study enrolled 129 PSP patients and 65 APD patients (Hoehn and Yahr >= 3), matched for sex and age. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed. Results: Over the previous year, 40 % of PSP patients did not encounter a physical therapist, while only one-third met a speech and language therapist and 5 % an occupational therapist. More than 20 % received in-home care and 32 % needed home structural changes. Compared to APD, PSP patients required more day-time, night-time and home structural changes. When considering both PSP and APD in multivariate analysis, reduced functional autonomy and living without a family caregiver were both related to day-time home assistance and to the need of at least one home care service. A PSP diagnosis compared to APD was a risk factor for having at least four multidisciplinary visits in a year. Finally, PSP diagnosis and being from the Northern Italy were significantly related with home structural changes. Conclusions: There's a significant gap in providing multidisciplinary care for PSP patients. Our findings emphasize the need for a shared, integrated care plan at a national level for patients with atypical parkinsonism.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.