Objectives: The new EU Directive on Road Infrastructure Safety Management requires Member States to classify the road network into at least three categories according to its safety level. This study examines the application and transferability of the procedures between EU countries. Methods: Our methodology consisted of two steps. First, we conducted a questionnaire survey among twenty Hungarian road safety inspectors, and second, we applied the Italian procedure to calculate the risk index and compare it with historical crash data. Two-lane rural roads were selected and divided into 200 m sections, excluding intersections. Road safety inspectors evaluated these using a matrix of 18 criteria based on video recordings. The risk index was calculated, together with a sensitivity analysis, and its consistency with the observed crash history was investigated. Finally, three homogeneous groups were identified using k-medoids cluster analysis. Results: The survey showed good acceptance of the process, but we also found differences in how inspectors rated certain criteria. Our analysis of inspectors' ratings of severity showed that there were varying degrees of agreement. However, we also concluded that the three-level rating may help to reduce disagreement. Our risk index calculations used four years of crash data, and a moderate correlation between the crash rate and the risk index was found. By assigning a weighted average of adjacent sections and performing a k-medoids cluster analysis, we found that the optimal number of clusters is three, and these show a meaningful relationship with crash frequency. Conclusion: Regarding the application of the Italian procedure in Hungary to meet the requirements of the new EU RISM, the results are promising, and the lessons learned may also be useful for other countries.
Transferability of safety inspection procedures for network-wide safety assessment of two-lane rural roads - an Italian-Hungarian experiment
Cafiso, Salvatore;Di Graziano, Alessandro;Pappalardo, Giuseppina
2025-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: The new EU Directive on Road Infrastructure Safety Management requires Member States to classify the road network into at least three categories according to its safety level. This study examines the application and transferability of the procedures between EU countries. Methods: Our methodology consisted of two steps. First, we conducted a questionnaire survey among twenty Hungarian road safety inspectors, and second, we applied the Italian procedure to calculate the risk index and compare it with historical crash data. Two-lane rural roads were selected and divided into 200 m sections, excluding intersections. Road safety inspectors evaluated these using a matrix of 18 criteria based on video recordings. The risk index was calculated, together with a sensitivity analysis, and its consistency with the observed crash history was investigated. Finally, three homogeneous groups were identified using k-medoids cluster analysis. Results: The survey showed good acceptance of the process, but we also found differences in how inspectors rated certain criteria. Our analysis of inspectors' ratings of severity showed that there were varying degrees of agreement. However, we also concluded that the three-level rating may help to reduce disagreement. Our risk index calculations used four years of crash data, and a moderate correlation between the crash rate and the risk index was found. By assigning a weighted average of adjacent sections and performing a k-medoids cluster analysis, we found that the optimal number of clusters is three, and these show a meaningful relationship with crash frequency. Conclusion: Regarding the application of the Italian procedure in Hungary to meet the requirements of the new EU RISM, the results are promising, and the lessons learned may also be useful for other countries.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
