Minimally Invasive Hepatic Resection Option for Access to the Waiting List of a Single Regional Transplant Center in Southern Italy: Entry and Dropout Flows' Analysis

Background/Objectives: The increasing adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and changes in clinical management may influence access to curative treatments for patients on the liver transplant waiting list. We aimed to analyze temporal trends in LLR use and to explore the association between the proportion of LLR and the dropout rate from the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. A secondary objective was to assess the risk of dropout or death versus curative treatment (transplantation or resection) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with non-HCC candidates using a competing-risk model. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients listed for liver transplantation between 2015 and 2023. Annual rates of LLR and dropout were calculated, and their correlation was evaluated using Spearman's rho. The risk of dropout/death and competing curative events (OLT, resection, or thermal ablation) was assessed using Fine-Gray competing-risk regression, adjusted for HCC status. Results: From 2015 to 2023, LLR accounted for a progressively increasing proportion of liver resections. A significant negative correlation was observed between annual LLR rates and dropout rates (rho = -0.78, p = 0.008), indicating fewer ITT failures with greater LLR adoption. In the competing-risk analysis, HCC patients had a significantly lower subdistribution hazard for dropout/death (SHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.42, p < 0.001) and a higher probability of receiving a curative treatment (SHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.40-1.94, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The increased use of LLR was associated with improved access to curative therapies and a reduced dropout risk on the liver transplant waiting list. HCC patients showed a more favorable competing-risk profile compared with non-HCC candidates.