Current research and development in understanding road users’ driving behaviors play a key role in improving traffic safety. Recently, several driving simulators have been employed as a suitable approach to investigate several drivers’ responses in challenging traffic scenarios. Although professional drivers represent a particular category among driving populations, the body of literature about their comparative behavioral and psychological characteristics remains limited. This study examined the differences in driving performance and visual and physiological responses between civilian and professional drivers in a simulated environment. A total of 30 drivers, with an equal split between professional and civilian categories, took part in a series of driving simulations. The simulations incorporated various infrastructure types, including four cone avoidance tasks and a high-speed motorway task. This study collected comprehensive data on performance metrics, hand usage, heart rate, and eye movements. Eye-tracking technology was used to measure visual attention. The findings revealed that during cone avoidance scenarios, civilian drivers exhibited a similar performance, visual behavior, and physiological response, except for the speed, experiment duration, and throttle, to professional drivers. In the motorway scenario, all metrics showed no significant difference between the two driver groups. These results highlight the need for cautious interpretation, particularly given the limitations of the sample. Revalidation is needed in larger studies, especially for understanding the differences between drivers’ metrics, which is crucial to elevate drivers’ safety, and assessing training programs in Hungary.

Comparative Analysis of Driving Performance and Visual and Physiological Responses Between Professional and Civilian Drivers in Simulated Environments

Pappalardo, Giuseppina
2025-01-01

Abstract

Current research and development in understanding road users’ driving behaviors play a key role in improving traffic safety. Recently, several driving simulators have been employed as a suitable approach to investigate several drivers’ responses in challenging traffic scenarios. Although professional drivers represent a particular category among driving populations, the body of literature about their comparative behavioral and psychological characteristics remains limited. This study examined the differences in driving performance and visual and physiological responses between civilian and professional drivers in a simulated environment. A total of 30 drivers, with an equal split between professional and civilian categories, took part in a series of driving simulations. The simulations incorporated various infrastructure types, including four cone avoidance tasks and a high-speed motorway task. This study collected comprehensive data on performance metrics, hand usage, heart rate, and eye movements. Eye-tracking technology was used to measure visual attention. The findings revealed that during cone avoidance scenarios, civilian drivers exhibited a similar performance, visual behavior, and physiological response, except for the speed, experiment duration, and throttle, to professional drivers. In the motorway scenario, all metrics showed no significant difference between the two driver groups. These results highlight the need for cautious interpretation, particularly given the limitations of the sample. Revalidation is needed in larger studies, especially for understanding the differences between drivers’ metrics, which is crucial to elevate drivers’ safety, and assessing training programs in Hungary.
2025
driver performance metrics
driving simulation
eye-tracking technology
professional drivers
road safety training
visual behavior
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/701690
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact