This essay examines the relation between vengeance, sanction and the symbolic form of law. It argues that the transition from private retribution to institutional justice does not abolish violence but reconfigures its role within a ritual grammar of social order. Drawing on Girard and contemporary analyses of digital contagion, it considers whether modern legal structures can sustain their normative force in the absence of coherent mediation. The essay concludes that law’s claim to meaning depends not on eradicating its archaic roots but on remembering the limits of what it can promise.

Mimesis and Sanction

SCIACCA F.
2025-01-01

Abstract

This essay examines the relation between vengeance, sanction and the symbolic form of law. It argues that the transition from private retribution to institutional justice does not abolish violence but reconfigures its role within a ritual grammar of social order. Drawing on Girard and contemporary analyses of digital contagion, it considers whether modern legal structures can sustain their normative force in the absence of coherent mediation. The essay concludes that law’s claim to meaning depends not on eradicating its archaic roots but on remembering the limits of what it can promise.
2025
Law; Vengeance; Mimesis; Sacrifice; Digital Justice.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/708130
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact