Ruxolitinib is widely used in polycythemia vera (PV) following hydroxyurea failure. However, validated response criteria to predict long-term outcomes in ruxolitinib-treated patients are lacking, complicating clinical decision-making. We investigated predictors of event-free survival ([EFS]; including progression to post-PV myelofibrosis, thrombosis, hemorrhages, or death) after 6 months of ruxolitinib in 178 patients with PV enrolled in the observational PV-ARC study. After a median follow-up from ruxolitinib start of 3.50 years, 15 patients died, 7 had a thrombosis, 9 had a hemorrhage, and 21 progressed to myelofibrosis. Overall, 5-year EFS was 70.4%. Leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, phlebotomy need, lack of spleen length reduction ≥50% (SR50), and ruxolitinib dose <10 mg twice daily at 3 time points (baseline and months 3 and 6), were tested for association with EFS. Multivariable analysis identified 3 independent risk factors: (1) ruxolitinib dose <10 mg twice daily at ≥1 time point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; P =. 047), (2) no SR50 at months 3 and 6 (HR, 2.65; P =. 009), (3) phlebotomy requirement at ≥2 time points (HR, 2.11; P =. 039). Points were assigned as follows: 1 to phlebotomies at 1 time point; 2 to phlebotomies at ≥2 time points and to ruxolitinib <10 mg twice daily at ≥1 time point; and 2.5 to lack of SR50. Based on cumulative scores, we developed the PV–response to ruxolitinib after 6 months (PV-RR6) prognostic model, identifying 3 risk categories: low (score 0: 5-year EFS, 89.4% [n = 63]), intermediate (score 1-2.5: EFS, 71.0% [n = 82]), and high (score >2.5: EFS, 38.9% [n = 33]). PV-RR6 enables early identification of patients at risk of poor outcomes, supporting timely treatment optimization in ruxolitinib-treated patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06134102.

A dynamic prognostic model for polycythemia vera long-term outcomes in patients treated with ruxolitinib

Palumbo, Giuseppe A.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Ruxolitinib is widely used in polycythemia vera (PV) following hydroxyurea failure. However, validated response criteria to predict long-term outcomes in ruxolitinib-treated patients are lacking, complicating clinical decision-making. We investigated predictors of event-free survival ([EFS]; including progression to post-PV myelofibrosis, thrombosis, hemorrhages, or death) after 6 months of ruxolitinib in 178 patients with PV enrolled in the observational PV-ARC study. After a median follow-up from ruxolitinib start of 3.50 years, 15 patients died, 7 had a thrombosis, 9 had a hemorrhage, and 21 progressed to myelofibrosis. Overall, 5-year EFS was 70.4%. Leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, phlebotomy need, lack of spleen length reduction ≥50% (SR50), and ruxolitinib dose <10 mg twice daily at 3 time points (baseline and months 3 and 6), were tested for association with EFS. Multivariable analysis identified 3 independent risk factors: (1) ruxolitinib dose <10 mg twice daily at ≥1 time point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; P =. 047), (2) no SR50 at months 3 and 6 (HR, 2.65; P =. 009), (3) phlebotomy requirement at ≥2 time points (HR, 2.11; P =. 039). Points were assigned as follows: 1 to phlebotomies at 1 time point; 2 to phlebotomies at ≥2 time points and to ruxolitinib <10 mg twice daily at ≥1 time point; and 2.5 to lack of SR50. Based on cumulative scores, we developed the PV–response to ruxolitinib after 6 months (PV-RR6) prognostic model, identifying 3 risk categories: low (score 0: 5-year EFS, 89.4% [n = 63]), intermediate (score 1-2.5: EFS, 71.0% [n = 82]), and high (score >2.5: EFS, 38.9% [n = 33]). PV-RR6 enables early identification of patients at risk of poor outcomes, supporting timely treatment optimization in ruxolitinib-treated patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06134102.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/730293
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact