Rationale: Buprenorphine may be a useful alternative option to methadone in addicts. Opioids can produce severe changes in the immune system. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to compare the effect of sublingual buprenorphine and methadone on the immune system and to compare the two substances on the drying-out program compliance. Methods: We studied 62 randomized outpatients for a period of 12 months. Subjects ( 55 males and 7 females; mean age 25 +/- 4 years; average history of heroin abuse being 2 years) on maintenance treatment were assigned in two groups ( A and B). Methadone chloride ( medium dose 100 mg/day) was administered to group A, whereas group B received sublingual buprenorphine ( 32.40 +/- 2.8 mg/day). Urine toxicological screening, plasma levels of TNF-alpha interleukin-1, interleukin-beta, lymphocyte CD14 and a self-rating depression questionnaire were measured. Results: Urine screening was negative for opiates in 17.6% of group A and in 10.7% of group B ( p< 0.001; r= 0.62). Depression score was 62 +/- 2 in group A and 55 +/- 3 in group B ( p< 0.01). Cytokine and CD14 revealed higher concentrations both in groups A and B without significant differences ( p> 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusions: The effects of buprenorphine and methadone tested on the immune system were overlapping in our patients. The elevated cytokine levels observed may suggest that the two drugs stimulate immunologic hyperactivation of an immune system that was formerly inhibited by heroin. Furthermore, our data suggest that buprenorphine can be a valid alternative to methadone in maintenance treatment of chronic heroin abuse and referred a marked decline in depression.

Randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of methadone and buprenorphine on the immune system in drug abusers

NERI, Sergio;BRUNO, Cosimo Marcello;MALAGUARNERA, Mariano;
2005-01-01

Abstract

Rationale: Buprenorphine may be a useful alternative option to methadone in addicts. Opioids can produce severe changes in the immune system. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to compare the effect of sublingual buprenorphine and methadone on the immune system and to compare the two substances on the drying-out program compliance. Methods: We studied 62 randomized outpatients for a period of 12 months. Subjects ( 55 males and 7 females; mean age 25 +/- 4 years; average history of heroin abuse being 2 years) on maintenance treatment were assigned in two groups ( A and B). Methadone chloride ( medium dose 100 mg/day) was administered to group A, whereas group B received sublingual buprenorphine ( 32.40 +/- 2.8 mg/day). Urine toxicological screening, plasma levels of TNF-alpha interleukin-1, interleukin-beta, lymphocyte CD14 and a self-rating depression questionnaire were measured. Results: Urine screening was negative for opiates in 17.6% of group A and in 10.7% of group B ( p< 0.001; r= 0.62). Depression score was 62 +/- 2 in group A and 55 +/- 3 in group B ( p< 0.01). Cytokine and CD14 revealed higher concentrations both in groups A and B without significant differences ( p> 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusions: The effects of buprenorphine and methadone tested on the immune system were overlapping in our patients. The elevated cytokine levels observed may suggest that the two drugs stimulate immunologic hyperactivation of an immune system that was formerly inhibited by heroin. Furthermore, our data suggest that buprenorphine can be a valid alternative to methadone in maintenance treatment of chronic heroin abuse and referred a marked decline in depression.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of methadone.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 92.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
92.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/7477
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 70
social impact