This study presents a comparative analysis of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites manufactured through vacuum assisted resin infusion (VARI) using a traditional epoxy resin (E), a fully-recyclable epoxy resin system with (BBR10) and without (BBR) the addition of a reactive diluent (R*Diluent). Various mechanical and thermal tests were conducted to assess their performance. The BBR10 laminate, incorporating 10 wt% R*Diluent, exhibited competitive mechanical performance, comparable to traditional (E) and fully-recyclable laminates (BBR). Despite a slightly lower ultimate tensile strength (UTS) compared with BBR, BBR10 demonstrated improved flexural strength and modulus. Low-velocity impact testing confirmed comparable strength between VARI-produced composites with the recyclable matrix (BBR and BBR10) and the traditional one (E). X-ray mCT investigations revealed distinct void arrangements in the CFRP laminates. Additionally, a chemical approach was employed for recovering high fractions of fibers from CFRP laminates with a recyclable matrix (BBR and BBR10). Chemical recycling achieved an almost 100% yield for long carbon fibers.Highlights Comparative analysis of CFRP composites manufactured through VARI. Diluent addition allowed to tailor the recyclable epoxy viscosity. Mechanical characterization of traditional and fully recyclable epoxy resins. Investigation by X-ray mCT of potential flaws and manufacturing defects. Chemical recycling of CFRP laminates with a recyclable matrix.Schematic representation of the work conducted on the characterization of carbon fiber laminates produced using fully recyclable biobased epoxy resin and conventional epoxy resin. image

Comparison of carbon‐reinforced composites manufactured by vacuum assisted resin infusion with traditional and fully recyclable epoxy resins

Claudio Tosto
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Lorena Saitta
Secondo
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites manufactured through vacuum assisted resin infusion (VARI) using a traditional epoxy resin (E), a fully-recyclable epoxy resin system with (BBR10) and without (BBR) the addition of a reactive diluent (R*Diluent). Various mechanical and thermal tests were conducted to assess their performance. The BBR10 laminate, incorporating 10 wt% R*Diluent, exhibited competitive mechanical performance, comparable to traditional (E) and fully-recyclable laminates (BBR). Despite a slightly lower ultimate tensile strength (UTS) compared with BBR, BBR10 demonstrated improved flexural strength and modulus. Low-velocity impact testing confirmed comparable strength between VARI-produced composites with the recyclable matrix (BBR and BBR10) and the traditional one (E). X-ray mCT investigations revealed distinct void arrangements in the CFRP laminates. Additionally, a chemical approach was employed for recovering high fractions of fibers from CFRP laminates with a recyclable matrix (BBR and BBR10). Chemical recycling achieved an almost 100% yield for long carbon fibers.Highlights Comparative analysis of CFRP composites manufactured through VARI. Diluent addition allowed to tailor the recyclable epoxy viscosity. Mechanical characterization of traditional and fully recyclable epoxy resins. Investigation by X-ray mCT of potential flaws and manufacturing defects. Chemical recycling of CFRP laminates with a recyclable matrix.Schematic representation of the work conducted on the characterization of carbon fiber laminates produced using fully recyclable biobased epoxy resin and conventional epoxy resin. image
2024
composites
epoxy blends
recycling
vacuum assisted resin infusion
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Polymer Composites - 2024 - Tosto - Comparison of carbon‐reinforced composites manufactured by vacuum assisted resin.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.93 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/631109
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact