The impact of minimal processing on the shelf life of White and Violet-pigmentedcauliflowers packaged in two different films was evaluated during refrigeratedstorage. White cauliflower was characterized by a weight loss around 8% after 5 daysof storage in the perforated film, while the Violet-pigmented exceeded 22%.Packaging in the permeable film was effective at reducing the weight loss for bothvarieties to about 0.3%. The colorimetric analysis on racemes from both varieties didnot reveal significant differences during storage, while important changes wereobserved on the cut surfaces of the White cultivar. Packaging in the permeable filmallowed cauliflower, irrespective of the variety, to reach a steady-state O2 level rangingfrom 11 to 13% and a CO2 level of 8.5% after 72 hours. Although the initial mesophilicbacteria counts in both cultivars were high, all the analyzed samples were incompliance with the recommended microbial limits of total plate counts (8 log cfu/g).Count values for molds and yeasts reached the limit values (5 log cfu/g) after a fewdays of storage, especially for the White-type packaged in the perforated film, while adifferent behaviour was shown by Enterobacteriaceae, which evidenced a higher loadthroughout the considered storage period in samples packaged in the permeable film.The use of a non-perforated, permeable packaging determines a suitable atmosphere,limiting moisture loss. Violet cauliflower is more suitable for minimal processing dueto a higher color stability on the cut surface area, however, microbial quality of rawmaterials represents a crucial aspect for the shelf life extension.

Evaluation of Some Quality Parameters of Minimally Processed White and Violet-pigmented Cauliflowers Curds

MURATORE, Giuseppe;BRANCA, Ferdinando;CAGGIA, Cinzia;RANDAZZO, CINZIA LUCIA;RESTUCCIA, Cristina
2013-01-01

Abstract

The impact of minimal processing on the shelf life of White and Violet-pigmentedcauliflowers packaged in two different films was evaluated during refrigeratedstorage. White cauliflower was characterized by a weight loss around 8% after 5 daysof storage in the perforated film, while the Violet-pigmented exceeded 22%.Packaging in the permeable film was effective at reducing the weight loss for bothvarieties to about 0.3%. The colorimetric analysis on racemes from both varieties didnot reveal significant differences during storage, while important changes wereobserved on the cut surfaces of the White cultivar. Packaging in the permeable filmallowed cauliflower, irrespective of the variety, to reach a steady-state O2 level rangingfrom 11 to 13% and a CO2 level of 8.5% after 72 hours. Although the initial mesophilicbacteria counts in both cultivars were high, all the analyzed samples were incompliance with the recommended microbial limits of total plate counts (8 log cfu/g).Count values for molds and yeasts reached the limit values (5 log cfu/g) after a fewdays of storage, especially for the White-type packaged in the perforated film, while adifferent behaviour was shown by Enterobacteriaceae, which evidenced a higher loadthroughout the considered storage period in samples packaged in the permeable film.The use of a non-perforated, permeable packaging determines a suitable atmosphere,limiting moisture loss. Violet cauliflower is more suitable for minimal processing dueto a higher color stability on the cut surface area, however, microbial quality of rawmaterials represents a crucial aspect for the shelf life extension.
2013
browning; microbiological quality; passive modified atmosphere
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Licciardello et al.2013 Quality Parameters Minimally Processed.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 242.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
242.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11769/53575
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact